Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transocean rejects Anadarko claim of force majeure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:53 AM
Original message
Transocean rejects Anadarko claim of force majeure
SAN FRANCISCO, June 15 (Reuters) - Transocean Ltd (RIGN.S) (RIG.N) has rejected a claim of force majeure by Anadarko Petroleum Corp (APC.N) on a deepwater rig in the Gulf of Mexico due to the U.S. deepwater drilling moratorium.

Transocean, with 14 rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, said contracts varied in their treatment of an "actual" force majeure event, and "several customers" had indicated they might declare it, but it was pushing back against this trend.

"We do not believe that a force majeure event exists as a result of the drilling moratorium," Transocean said in its latest fleet update on Tuesday.

more:http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1510902320100615

UPDATE: Fitch Increases Chances Of Cutting Anadarko To Junk

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES Fitch Ratings became the last of the three major credit raters to cut its outlook on Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC) to negative because of increasing costs from the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Standards & Poor's Ratings Services last week lowered its outlook on the company to negative from stable, as Moody's Investors Service did the week before.

As a nonoperating partner in the underwater well, which is still gushing thousands of barrels of oil daily, Anadarko could potentially owe a 25% share of the containment and cleanup costs associated with the spill, as well as compensatory economic damages. The share reflects its 25% nonoperating working interest in the well where the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded and sank in April.

Fitch said the negative outlook reflects the possibility that those costs could greatly exceed Fitch's current estimates. Currently, it believes Anadarko has the capacity to cover its requirements even if it does have to pay a full 25% of the costs and still remain investment grade. It doesn't expect the company to sustain any punitive damages.

more: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100615-713984.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Japan Mitsui
holds the bag on 10% too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC