Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those of us who pine for justice to amend warranties wire tapping's, read this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:00 PM
Original message
For those of us who pine for justice to amend warranties wire tapping's, read this:
House Intelligence Staffer Tried to Intervene on Illegal Wiretap Program
By: emptywheel Sunday June 13, 2010 8:30 am

EFF's logo for its case against NSA warrantless wiretapping (graphic by hugh electronic via Flickr)

Scott Shane and Eric Lichtblau tell a sort of weird story of how a House Intelligence Committee staffer, Diane Roark, tried to reach out to William Rehnquist to get him to review Dick Cheney’s illegal wiretapping program.

Within months of the beginning of the eavesdropping program in October 2001, a staff member of the House Intelligence Committee, alerted to the possibility of illegal spying by N.S.A. insiders and hoping to prompt a high-level legal review, wrote to Chief Justice Rehnquist asking for a meeting, according to several people familiar with the episode.

The Congressional staff member, Diane S. Roark, routed the letter through the chief justice’s daughter, Janet Rehnquist, then the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services; Ms. Rehnquist was a high school acquaintance of one of Ms. Roark’s N.S.A. contacts.

There was no response, and it is not known whether the letter was seen by the chief justice or prompted him to make inquiries.

What’s weird about the story, first of all, is the method of approach. Are you telling me there are Congressional staffers who think Rehnquist could have legally reviewed this program in response to a request sent via his daughter (though it sounds like something Arlen “no longer Haggis or Scrapple” Specter might try)?

But then there’s a detail that Shane and Lichtblau don’t mention: Roark left HPSCI just after this attempt to have Rehnquist review the illegal wiretap program, ostensibly retiring.
http://firedoglake.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think warranties should ever be amended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonney2020 Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. while consumer law is interesting, I'm not sure thats what this article on warrant-less wiretappings
was addressing. Spelling error perhaps? Do you read these articles you comment on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rehnquists's daughter is just as much of a tool as he was. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. while Ms. Roark
may have been naive to think that Rehnquist would even be willing to review the illegal wiretapping (much less rule against it), I think she should be admired for trying to do something. That's more than Nancy Pelosi, Jane Harmon and other Dems did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. *warrant-less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC