|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 05:39 AM Original message |
Rachel Maddow, National Treasure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. You mean a lesbian is influencing the national conversation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. Rachel does a good interview. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
margotb822 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I mean, she *is* a Rhodes scholar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
66 dmhlt (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. Well, like I said over at DK - I just think we need to be honest here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. No offense, but God doesnt have anything to do with this. She is by far the best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
6. Ironic, is it not, that Tim Kaine and Obama see Rand Paul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 01:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
33. Sad but true about TK and the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FirstTimeVoterAt37 (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
7. I admire... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I'm glad somebody else noticed that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Welcome to DU.. and (apparently) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FirstTimeVoterAt37 (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Three little words, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. +111111111 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Randypiper (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:55 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Download and listen whenever you want to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 07:24 AM Response to Reply #31 |
41. Ooooh!! THANKS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 03:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
34. You must have watched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyc 4 Biden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
8. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jotsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. That is one barbarian she called out at the gate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 04:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. + 100. She's without peer. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Very effective, Rachel is clearly the best! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Rachel and Kent in HD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. She's a national treasure for sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. Rachel, quite simply, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm expecting to see her earn awards in journalism. She is the best there is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. National treasure indeed!!! She's the best in the business today. I can miss any other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Well put. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Thanks, rhett o rick. I forgot to add funny. Her sense of humor is priceless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. Agreed and recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
21. Rec 60. Ms Maddow is the top journalist on TV. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 03:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. No question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. I so agree. I am hopping Anderson Cooper see the light and becomes a true journalist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
25. She'll be the next Edward R Murrow. I'd bet on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsharp88 (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. No, they won't allow it for fear of stirring up "liberal media" charges by the wingnuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-21-10 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. She is so consistently good at what she does. I love it that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
29. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
30. Thank you, Rachel Maddow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
36. K&R! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meowomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
37. Absolutely k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
38. Kick and Rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paper Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 05:31 AM Response to Original message |
39. K & R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PADemD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-10 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
40. I wish Rachel could interview our Supreme Court nominees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC