Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kandahar Cluster**** Watch Pt. 2: military intervention...inflame Afghan public opinion against NATO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 04:00 PM
Original message
Kandahar Cluster**** Watch Pt. 2: military intervention...inflame Afghan public opinion against NATO
Kandahar Cluster**** Watch Pt. 2
Posted by Michael Cohen

About a year ago when I first started writing about counter-insurgency and Afghanistan I did so because I was struck by the glaring disconnect between the tactical approaches being advocated for in Afghanistan and America's larger strategic interests there. It's not that I am some raging dove, but something about the strategy just didn't seem to make sense to me; and it seemed to reflect an approach driven more by American can-doism rather than a realistic appraisal of US interests and capabilities. A year later, the problem only seems to be getting worse.

The embrace of a COIN approach in Afghanistan remains the tactical equivalent of sticking a round peg in a square hole. Indeed, even by the doctrinal standards laid out in the flawed FM 3-24, Afghanistan is an incredibly poor choice for waging a COIN fight - what with the combination of almost non-existent host country support, the continued existence of an external safe haven, the lack of enough US troops, a fully-resourced civilian surge and diminishing political will both in the US and among NATO countries. In short, if not for the supposed success of COIN in Iraq - and the fetishization of counter-insurgency doctrine in the US military - would anyone actually come to the conclusion that Afghanistan is a good place to wage a COIN fight? I seriously doubt it.

What we have seen repeatedly is an adherence to COIN, for the sake of COIN. The similarities to the strategic myopia we saw in Vietnam in Iraq are almost too uncomfortable to note. Military and political decisions are made that seem to ignore any piece of contradictory evidence. And the upcoming offensive in Kandahar is example A of how this delusional process manifests itself on the ground.

Nominally our goal in Southern Afghanistan is not simply to defeat the Taliban, but also to protect the Afghan people and encourage them to side with the government against the insurgents. As I tried to point out yesterday, every available indication suggests that military intervention in Afghanistan will not only likely fail to accomplish these goals, but may actually inflame Afghan public opinion against NATO.

<more>

http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2010/04/kandahar-cluster-watch-pt-2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC