Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Hightower: The Screwed-Up Airlines Are Proof That 'Free Enterprise' Is Bogus Corporate PR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:08 AM
Original message
Jim Hightower: The Screwed-Up Airlines Are Proof That 'Free Enterprise' Is Bogus Corporate PR
AlterNet / By Jim Hightower

Hightower: The Screwed-Up Airlines Are Proof That 'Free Enterprise' Is Bogus Corporate PR
Thank goodness the airline chiefs are not trying to run a hot dog stand or taco trailer. The competition would kill them.

April 22, 2010 |


Golly, whatever happened to America's good ol', bold-and-brassy, can-do competitive drive?

To see a troubling sign for our nation's famed, free-enterprise frontier spirit, sneak a peek at the downward flight path of America's major airlines. These corporations have become no-can-do, anti-competition behemoths, whining that there are too many airlines, too many planes, too much competition.

"It's a jungle out there," wail top executives of the airlines. So, to enhance their "competitiveness," they are urging a rash of mergers that would consolidate the industry into fewer and even bigger corporations. Yes, in their alternate (and perverse) universe, airline CEOs say that the only way they can compete is to ... well, have less competition!

"The industry needs to evolve into a more rational structure," asserts a top official at American Airlines. "We have an industry that is too fragmented, with too many competitors and with different ideas of capacity, pricing and strategic activity."

Hmmm. Where have we heard that before? Oh yes, from Adam Smith, the 18th century Scottish economist who is considered a founding guru of the free enterprise system. The notion of "many competitors ... with different ideas of capacity, pricing and strategic activity" is precisely what Smith hailed as the proper model for free enterprise. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/economy/146556/hightower%3A_the_screwed-up_airlines_are_proof_that_%27free_enterprise%27_is_bogus_corporate_pr



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Airlines have become intolerable
I say let them all go the way of the dinosaur.

And further, all these massive multi-nationals have become anti-competitive. Perhaps we should clear the slate and allow competition once again.

Regional/Local economies are sustainable models. Global models are simply unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. "too many competitors" is only a problem for the competitors
the only area where the right-wing likes too many competitors is the labor market, where they consider consolidation and mergers (i.e., unions) to be anti-capitalist, anti-american, commie plots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Icarus was the first neoliberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgc1961 Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. I disagree.
"Soon, at least one more brand name is expected to join Northwest, Pan Am, TWA and others that have succumbed to consolidation."

In my estimation, the Pan Am and TWA failures were more about being lousy airlines than consolidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC