Here's the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/international/middleeast/23IRAQ.html?thAnd here's some excerpts:
Presented last fall with a detailed catalog of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison, the American military responded on Dec. 24 with a confidential letter to a Red Cross official asserting that many Iraqi prisoners were not entitled to the full protections of the Geneva Conventions.
The letter, drafted by military lawyers and signed by Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, emphasized the "military necessity" of isolating some inmates at the prison for interrogation because of their "significant intelligence value," and said prisoners held as security risks could legally be treated differently from prisoners of war or ordinary criminals
Oh, I guess that the innocent 70-90% who were picked up in sweeping raids had significant intelligence value. And that we meant torture and murder when we said "treated differently".