Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marijuana Legalization Will Be On California's 2010 Ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:22 PM
Original message
Marijuana Legalization Will Be On California's 2010 Ballot

By Daniela Perdomo, AlterNet
Posted on December 14, 2009, Printed on December 14, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/www.alternet.org/144561/

The Tax & Regulate Cannabis 2010 campaign has just achieved a major victory in its efforts to legalize marijuana for all adults in California -- they have gathered the signatures necessary for inclusion on the state's November ballot.

"This is the next step to sane cannabis policies and the end to the hypocrisy and unjust prohibition of cannabis," pot entrepreneur Richard Lee told me this morning. He is a major sponsor of the Tax Cannabis initiative and the force -- and money -- behind Oaksterdam, the successful marijuana-friendly section of Oakland.

This win means that Californians will be the first in the nation to decide whether they believe marijuana ought be taxed and regulated for all adults over 21, much the same way alcohol is.



The drug reform movement's eyes will be on California next year, because many advocates believe that if the initiative passes, many other states could follow.

Support for marijuana legalization is at an all-time high, with polls ranging from 44 to 52 percent national support. In California, where marijuana has been legalized for medical use since 1996, 56 percent support legalization.

This may be why the campaign's organizers were able to gather so many signatures -- nearly 700,000 -- so quickly. Lee tells me the signature-gathering effort was launched only two months before they had achieved that massive list, although legally they were allotted five months to come up with the signatures. Lee collected a couple hundred himself.

Dale Sky Clare, the executive chancellor of Oaksterdam University, says there were at least 3,000 petitioners collecting signatures -- and they didn't have to work too hard to sell the cause. "Usually, before someone signs a ballot petition, they want to read it, see what it’s about, ask questions. But in our case, people didn’t even have to finish hearing the sentence -- 'legalize marijuana' was enough," Clare laughs.

By the last week of November, Tax Cannabis had handily exceeded the 433,971 required signatures it needed for ballot qualification and ended the petitioning stage of its campaign.

Clare and Lee share a celebratory and hopefully soothing joint as they field a barrage of calls from the mainstream media. They'll officially submit the signatures sometime in February, I hear Lee tell one reporter, so that they qualify for the November ballot instead of the one in June, which is expected to have a less favorable voter turnout.

So far, just over $1 million has been put into the campaign. Most of that money has come from Oaksterdam University, an institution Lee founded to prepare workers for roles in the cannabis industry. Lee says he has put some of his own money into the campaign, and a few other minor donors have also been moved to give.

"We're looking to raise $7 to 20 million" for the entire campaign, Lee says, "depending on opposition and how successful our fundraising is."

For the moment, Lee sees only a segment of the law enforcement lobby as opposition -- specifically, the California Narcotic Officers' Association. Calls to and requests for comment from the CNOA were not returned by the time this story was published.

Regarding fundraising, Clare acknowledges that the economic recession may result in supporters not being able to donate as much as they might otherwise. However, there are strong economic indicators for why this may nevertheless be the right initiative at the right time.

The Board of Equalization, California's tax regulator and the agency charged with collecting alcohol and tobacco taxes, estimates that legalizing marijuana could generate about $1.4 billion in tax revenue annually.


Further, the California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) published a report stating that legal marijuana would free up "several tens of millions of dollars annually" in correctional and law enforcement resources, which would in turn redirect funds to more urgent matters.


As of Dec. 1, California's debt was $83.5 billion. It is the largest borrower in the country, and pays 21.3 percent more interest on its nearly-junk-rated debt than states with the highest ratings. Public school systems and social programs are feeling the brunt of the debt crisis, which has even included closing national state parks, a source of wounded pride for many Californians.

Continued>>>
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/politics/144561/updated%3A_marijuana_legalization_will_be_on_california%27s_2010_ballot

It will collect MORE than 1.4 billion if you count the people you can let out of prison which will save the state another couple billion more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well if they pass it...there will be jobs in California at least :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see how it doesn't pass
The polling that I've seen on this has been pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I worry about the old farts voting and all of the tight ass married people with young children
They are the biggest obstacle to MJ legalization.

I've known people who used to be very liberal about drug policy, but as soon as they had kids, they became battle ready drug warriors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the party should be in Santa Cruz afterward

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. The LTTE in opposition to this
Will set new lows in spelling, grammar, and logic. Serious attention should be paid to the astroturf opposition groups, and the people funding them should be outed at the earliest opprutunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. A ray of sunshine.
My only concern is for out of state pressure like we got on prop 8 last year. Otherwise this is pretty much a lay down for California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newby Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. additional votes
maybe if you all think the vote will be a close one you can get acorn to work their magic. After all it worked for the presidential election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, ACORN helped register a lot of lower-income and minority voters -- primarily Democrats.
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 02:08 PM by Tutankhamun
The organization was very successful at mobilizing voters in an open, legal, and ethical way. This is the real reason Fox News went after them with such furor. And naturally, people like you who aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer actually fell for the Faux News anti-acorn bullshit.

Enjoy your stay at DU, moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC