Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Promotes Narcotics Trade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 08:41 AM
Original message
CIA Promotes Narcotics Trade
CIA Promotes Narcotics Trade
Junge Welt, Germany
By Rainer Rupp
Translated By Ron Argentati
29 October 2009

“There’s no significant drug trafficking anywhere in the world in which the CIA isn’t involved.” This truism has again been confirmed by a report in the New York Times. While in the past it was limited to hanky-panky with drug lords in Latin America or Southeast Asia, this time the agency, according to the New York Times article, is actually part of an organized crime operation in the Hindu Kush war zone. Active and former U.S. intelligence personnel claim that Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, is a known key player in the Afghan drug world but has nonetheless been on the CIA payroll for the past eight years. It is therefore absurd that U.S. politicians and the American media are condemning President Karzai for not prosecuting his brother.

The campaign began about a year ago, after the White House decided to start looking for an alternative to President Karzai. But apparently the left hand in Washington did not know what the right hand was up to, as it became known that Karzai’s brother was at that time considered a valuable employee of the CIA. As a Pashtun, Ahmed is both the eyes and ears of the intelligence service deep within the Taliban-controlled Pashtun tribal areas where, thanks to his criminal network, he has many connections. At the same time, Ahmed was helping the CIA to set up contact with tribal leaders who either were cooperating with the Taliban or wished to switch allegiances to the U.S. side. CIA special units would be able to use Ahmed’s far-flung areas of influence as a base for their clandestine operations.

As pay, the CIA helped President Karzai’s brother by ridding him of two bothersome competitors: Matiullah Qati, Police Chief of Kandahar province, was “accidentally” shot to death by a CIA special operations unit, and Karzai also inherited drug baron Hajji Bashir Noorzai’s business after Noorzai, with Ahmed’s help, fell into an American trap, was arrested, later convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. The New York Times reached either the pinnacle of naïveté or was playing administration apologist by saying, “CIA practices in Afghanistan suggest that the United States isn’t doing everything in its power to eradicate the lucrative narcotics trade in Afghanistan.”

Meanwhile, hostilities in Afghanistan are escalating. October is, so far, the bloodiest month for U.S. forces since the start of the fighting, with 55 killed in action. The second worst month was the preceding August, when 51 died. Simultaneously, predictions that armed enemies of the occupation might begin operating in the relatively secure capital city of Kabul seem to be have been accurate. This was demonstrated by the Wednesday morning attack on the United Nations guesthouse in the government zone that had previously been considered “absolutely secure.” Nine people died in that attack, six of them foreign U.N. workers. This attack underlines the U.N.’s total failure. Because of pressure from the United States and other NATO countries, it has now become a handmaiden of the occupation forces and thus also a target of the insurgency.


Article at: http://watchingamerica.com/News/36568/cia-promotes-narcotics-trade/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. This has become quite obvious to anybody who is paying attention.
It makes sense of course. People working for the CIA have the access to raw crops, such as coca or opium, the training and ability to organize it's production, tit's refinement, and it's transportation to market.

This has been happening since at least Vietnam.

I'm always surprised that it isn't common knowledge, since it's so widespread and so on-going.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Reporter is WRONG - drugrunning by CIA was NEVER 'LIMITED in the past'. Global terror networks were
grown in the 70s and 80s throughout poppy-growing regions thanks to the illegal operations of Poppy Bush and his pals at BCCI.

Drugrunning + Armsdealing + Moneylaundering = BushInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Some people find hypocrisy more distasteful than bullets. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Paging Gary Webb...
Dude who wrote this better beware small planes, guns and bathtubs, just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It will never matter one bit.
We have a M$M that would ignore anything and everything they're told to ignore, no matter how much evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Remember the "crack epidemic"? The CIA sure does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. self-funding through drug trafficking is a way to avoid congressional oversight
if they aren't paying for something, they can't very well know to ask about what they are paying for can they?

John Perkins mentioned this in CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC