Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dave Lindorff: The Address President Obama Should Give to Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:24 PM
Original message
Dave Lindorff: The Address President Obama Should Give to Congress
http://blog.buzzflash.com/lindorff/271

My Fellow Americans.

I stand before you a chastened president. I made a mistake. Two mistakes really. (wild applause from Republican side)

I thought that Congress could do its job and through the deliberative process, produce a health care reform plan that would win broad support across the aisle and among all of you. But I'm afraid that I was wrong. Health care is an enormous industry -- maybe the biggest and most powerful industry in the country -- and it has far too much power in Congress. Literally thousands of lobbyists, carrying tens of billions of dollars in campaign contributions -- have invaded these halls and distorted the process, and in the end have stymied reform. (some hissing)

Meanwhile, I have realized that the answer has been staring us in the face all along.

And that was my second mistake. I told the American Medical Association that while single-payer medical plans, where the government is the insurer, might work well in other countries, the idea of government running health care was not part of our American tradition. In fact, it is, and has been since 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson signed into law the Medicare program. Medicare is a single-payer program, and polls and surveys show it is enormously popular with older and disabled Americans. Medicare has relieved our parents and grandparents from the fear that they will not get medical care when they stop working, and it has lifted the enormous burden and worry off of younger Americans over how to pay for the care of their elders, and it has done this with enormous efficiency, all while allowing recipients to choose their own doctors and hospitals. (applause)

So we really don't need to re-invent the wheel. There is no point in members of Congress having to hold endless hearings, and to sit and listen to the pitches of lobbyists from the medical establishment. We can just expand Medicare to cover everyone. (applause)

How much would that cost? Well, we know that 10% of the elderly -- the oldest and sickest among them -- account for 50% of total Medicare costs, so that means the other 90% only cost some $200 billion a year. Even if we assumed that the rest of the population's medical bills were as high as those 90%, it would mean that expanding Medicare to cover them would cost less than $1 trillion a year, and probably closer to $750 billion. So roughly speaking, we're talking about adding $750 billion a year to the cost of Medicare.

Now that's a big number, and I know that some of you -- a lot of you -- worry about higher taxes. But let me assure you, expanding Medicare to cover everyone is going to save you money -- virtually everyone. Let's look at why that is, and why you cannot just look at the federal tax when you consider those savings.

Today, the United States spends nearly 20 percent of GDP on health care. That is more than double what any other country in the world spends on health care. And you know what? We don't get our money's worth for all that dough. Canadians, who spend half that percentage of their GDP on health care, and who have what amounts to Medicare for all with their single-payer system (they call it Medicare too), have longer lifespans and better infant mortality statistics than we do. In fact, Cuba and Mexico have better child health statistics than we do!


CONCLUSION AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well that seems easy enough. nt
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 04:41 PM by DURHAM D
On edit: And simple enough for house members to understand.

As I said yesterday. If Obama gets the people then they will get the legislators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. They should expand Medicare...
...for all who want to opt in. Those who opt in should pay a premium large enough to cover costs of expanding the pool.

Those low income people should receive a sliding subsidy depending about the relationship of their income to the poverty level.

But all those who currently have insurance that they like should be allowed to keep that coverage.

That would be a plan that could get up and running very quickly with an existing infrastructure that people already trust.

It offers choice, expands the pool of the insured, should cut costs with Medicare's proven track record of negotiation of procedure costs, puts a competitor in the marketplace that allows for pre-existing conditions and portability.

I think over time it would become a defacto National Single Payer system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have a question regarding this sentence.
"But all those who currently have insurance that they like should be allowed to keep that coverage."

Why? If their employer is paying it currently they will likely stop doing so soon. If they are buying it themselves (not at group rates) why would they want to keep it?

Also, if everyone receives medicare they can still go buy a private supplemental if they need it. Millions of seniors (probably most) currently buy private insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It doesn't matter why they would want to keep it....
...if they like it they can keep it, no matter how assinine that decision is.

It gives people the choice to buy what they feel they need.

If their employer stops covering them, they can choose Medicare or a private plan. It is up to them.

If they want a cadillac plan they can buy it.

The beauty of this is that it offers both choice and competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. This would be the best thing he could ever do.
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 04:59 PM by PHIMG
Unite the Public Option camp and those holding out for Single Payer, really stick it to the insurers, tell the middle class -- you'll never have to worry about insurance ever again, you'll never see a bill for medical services ever again, show the fiscal conservatives that it is the only plan that saves hundreds of billions and dollars.

People who are left of the Democratic Party will finally have a moment of HOPE that Obama is not going to be a Clinton-style triangulator pushing the party to the right for political expediency.

If he came out for SINGLE PAYER it would poor Miracle Grow on the grassroots and just unleash a huge wave of activism. It would be incredible!

OBAMA - DOUBLE DOWN ON SINGLE PAYER!

MEDICARE FOR ALL - we can't afford Private Insurers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. kickety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC