Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Midwestern Small Towns Have Been Ravaged by Meth Addiction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:58 AM
Original message
Why Midwestern Small Towns Have Been Ravaged by Meth Addiction
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 07:19 AM by marmar
Why Midwestern Small Towns Have Been Ravaged by Meth Addiction

By Charles Homans, Washington Monthly. Posted July 24, 2009.

Nick Reding's book "Methland" argues that the shocking rates of meth addiction in the US heartland are in many ways a product of globalization.




In an early scene in Nick Reding's Methland: The Death and Life of an American Small Town, a former meatpacker turned small-time methamphetamine cook in Oelwein, Iowa, named Roland Jarvis, inspired by a paranoid hallucination involving black helicopters, pours the hazardous chemicals comprising his home meth lab down the drain and then lights a cigarette, inadvertently blowing up his house and melting off most of his face. When the local police sergeant -- a high school classmate of Jarvis's -- arrives on the scene, Jarvis begs him to shoot him. No one -- the cops, the paramedics, Jarvis himself -- quite knows what to do. None of them has really been here before.

This, in a nutshell, is what scared Americans about methamphetamine when it began to seep into the periphery of the national consciousness, building into a full-blown panic by the mid-2000s. The drug itself, a powerful stimulant, is unpleasant enough, but as Reding observes, "in truth, all drug epidemics are only in part about the drugs." What allowed meth to capture the public imagination so fully was the way in which it attacked the stories that Americans told themselves about the primordial decency of the heartland. Aside from its ease of manufacture -- you can make meth out of readily available industrial and pharmaceutical products, enabling a twenty-first-century variant on the moonshiners of earlier generations such as Jarvis -- the drug's most novel aspect was its clientele: the same predominantly white small-town residents who had watched the urban depredations of crack cocaine from afar and told themselves that they weren't that kind of people. "We're in Iowa, for God's sake," a former Oelwein high school principal, explaining his decision to request police patrols of his school, tells Reding. "We don't do that." In mainstream America's Rockwellian imagination, police officers in towns like Oelwein were supposed to be stopping high school kids from making out in cars on prom night. In the meth age they suddenly needed bulletproof vests and hazmat training.

An August 2005 Newsweek cover story proclaimed meth to be "America's Most Dangerous Drug," which is highly debatable -- there are gaping holes in the statistics cited by both the alarmists and the skeptics. As Methland's title suggests, Reding, a magazine writer, tends toward the former. His account of meth's rise in the rural Midwest does not skimp on the grisly details; he paints a noir-ish picture of the region in which DEA agents set up meetings with drug informants in abandoned county airports, and vultures look on hungrily as detectives exhume the bodies of murder victims hastily stashed under semi trailers.

But Reding's ultimate aim is more subtle than that: he wants to situate the meth phenomenon as part and parcel of the broader economic and social forces that transformed the rural Midwest, in often wrenching ways, in the late twentieth century. The drug's Middle American evolution, he argues, was a basically rational product of a global economy that in many respects has not been much more forgiving to rural America's residents than the drug trade. "eth has always been less an agent of change and more of a symptom of it," he writes. "The end of a way of life is the story; the drug is what signaled to the rest of the nation that the end had come." .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/141550/why_midwestern_small_towns_have_been_ravaged_by_meth_addiction/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Being from that area I have got to get this book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree that drug use is about more than just the drugs
But meth is different. One of the things it does is burn out the pleasure centers in the brain. Everything changes after that.

And the people most affected appear to be the hard workers. Truck drivers, construction workers and on... Often, they began using so they could work harder and longer hours. A symptom of globalization? Yah think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's how one keeps their 3 uniquely american jobs.
Most of the people I knew who got into it did so initially because they needed something to keep them going while juggling jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that;s an interesting selection bias
all that proves (if anecdotal personal evidence ever prove much of anything) is that probably most of the people you know are responsible people not fuckups. iow, amongst that group, sure your experience makes sense. i caN SAY, as somebody who has investigated over a hundred meth cases and who worked undercover for years, hanging out with meth addicts in their own environment, that the VAST majority i met became addicted because they wanted to try meth for the pleasure aspect of it, and got hooked. i'm talking a much larger sample size than yours AND a sample that is not a subset of an obviously self-selected group. kind of reminds me of pauline kael's comment about how could nixon possibly have won, NOBODY she knew voted for him. personally, i am against the war on drugs, and think the dangerousness of many drugs is GROSSLY exaggerated. meth is a particularly awful drug though. in all my time undercover, and as a line cop as well, many many people who were cocaine, marijuana, etc. users were relatively positive about their drug. meth was different. it's hard to find a meth user, who has used it for more than 6 months who did not become addicted AND rue the day they tried it. that is very different than most cocaine and mj users.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I think meth sucks too.
Just my experience from hanging out with blue collar joes like me. May be limited and all, but it's a factor in some people's initial addiction. Can't say that the ones who really got into it kept their jobs or stayed responsible. I'm sure by the time you met them as undercover, they'd be pretty far gone.

And after 30 years of watching it do it's corrosive work, I now avoid meth users like the plague
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Word.
I know people that crank fucked up. I know people that got past it. I fooled with it, long ago, it scared me, and I never went back.

It made work easy. It was like that for a lot of the people I knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. spun
i strongly recommend the movie "spun". it is the best representation of the tweaker life i have ever seen. and it's quite funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I don't watch movies much, but I'll keep that in mind. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'll look for it, thank you,
Tho I don't doubt that my husband and I upon watching will spend the next 2 hours cringing because we know all the characters in real life.

Sounds like we are of much the same opinion on this stuff albeit thru differnt lenses. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Word up.
Scared the bejeezus outta me too.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. The meth horror stories are overblown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Really?
And your experience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. imo, yes
my experience is over 20 yrs in law enforcement, several years working DEEP undercover (iow hanging out with druggies in their own environment), etc. almost ALL media representations of illicnt drugs are overblown/exaggerated. that's the nature of a sensationalist media. however, i will say that meth is MUCH worse than any other illicit drug in wide circulation, and is a particularly awful drug. it is FAR FAR more addictive than practically any other drug, and incredibly detrimental to both physical and mental health. i have seen 16 yr old beautiful girls turn into skanked out hags in a few years of meth, unlike any other drug i have ever seen. meth is a frigging awful drug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for the feedback
Sometimes people will make pronouncements with no experience behind it at all. Interesting to hear the experience from your perspective. And I agree with you about the sensationalist media.

I was wondering if you were saying that the problem is not as generally widespread as reported or if you were referring to the Midwest in particular.

Here in the Northwest, meth is a big problem. And I also agree with you that meth is a nasty, nasty drug, unlike anything I've ever seen before.


That said, my experience of meth began when my 15 yo daughter was picked up at the mall by a young man, who turned out to be well over thirty. He introduced her to the drug. She was already acting up and behaving badly and out of my control and the drug... well, for quite awhile I was so naive, I didn't not understand what was going on. None of her behavior made any sense at all. She ended up running off with the guy and when I tried to get the authorities to help me get her back, I was told it probably wouldn't do any good. She'd just run away again.

I'm pretty sure that somehow he had her stripping at clubs in Portland and possibly he was pimping her out too. It was a nightmare.

When it finally got too dangerous for her and she wanted away from him, I took it into my own hands to get her away from him and that made me (and her stepfather and younger sisters) targets of a way whacked out tweaker. I began to get a clue. At one point I was held hostage at knifepoint until my daughter went with him.

Along the way I met a number of law enforcement people I really appreciated and of course there were a couple who were real jerks that were totally dismissive of me. They had a real classist attitude (city police).

The drug addict ended up stalking us and I called 911 so many times I eventually didn't even have to explain the situation to them. They just knew to send the sheriff. The sheriff finally caught the fellow who had enlisted someone else to help him (go hunt turkeys). When arrested, they had walkie talkies, guns and knives. They went away for a long time.

Meth does make people crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. a number of points about meth
first of all, the problem is pretty widespread, it's just not AS bad as the media says. (it rarely is). also, part of the problem is the media cried wolf with so many drugs before meth (especially their overblown crack hysteria, where one hit makes you a hopeless addict lol), that when they and the govt. try to talk about meth it comes out a little flat. some of the myths are just ridiculous. for example, i've been in dozens of meth labs. the chemicals (fumes especially) can be quite hazardous to health, but the whole meth lab blowing up thang is pretty rare. i'm sorry about your daughter. many people don't realize this but portland is an epicenter for runaways, and also one of the biggest producers of porn in the country. are the two related? maybe, but both are facts. the tweaker knifepoint thing does not surprise me at all. meth really does turn people into hyperparanoid, violent, delusional wack-jobs. i see it SO much. the walkie talkies guns and knives things does not surprise me at all. it's a running joke amongst law enforcement, the tweakers and technology thing. i don't know what it is about meth, but practically every meth-head has video surveillance cameras in and outside their house, and all kinds of gadgets. it's a very strange thing. it just makes people hyper-paranoid. i'm glad the guy who was stalking you got caught, and i hope your daughter got out ok. i am generally against the war on drugs. i certianly don't think pot should be illegal (a civil infraction at worst, but certainly not a crime), and frankly - powder cocaine isn't THAT bad, etc. kids and drugs are (and always will be) a problem , because kids are impulsive, less risk-averse, and think they are invincible. a kid who takes ecstacy once in a while will almost always turn out fine. one who makes it a twice a week occurrence, otoh, will eventually cause some serious damage. most people don't realize this, but ecstacy is a meth analog. 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine. see, i learned something in many years of drug cases and classes. and since society, the govt. and the media essentially lie and exaggerate about drugs like mj, youth and people in general don't trust them to be truthful about meth. meth really is BAD. ask any neurologist about what doing strong stimulant drugs like meth can do. and meth high (initially moreso than later on ) is SO pleasurable. ANY meth addict will tell you the high is way better than a (conventional orgasm). it is like an hours long orgasm but more intense. so, it's no wonder that people get hooked pretty easily. anyway, again, i hope your daughter is ok. i have seen some real scumbags who get young girls hooked on meth so they can essentially have their way with them. it's pretty frigging disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Pictures tell the story
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 03:55 AM by depakid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. suweeeet
i have a kick-ass powerpoint presentation with lots of pictures like that. some AMAZING transformations.

it's great to freak people out at... i mean present to the public :)

it's actually a good way to get many people not to do meth... "meth will make you ugly as fuck" is much more powerful than "just say no".

otoh, i have never seen a fat meth addict.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Speed is nasty stuff.
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 02:44 PM by bemildred
It most certainly is used as a propaganda vehicle, as are all "illegal drugs", but it is one of the few cases where I think the concern is well deserved, unless our desire is to evolve a speed-tolerent variant of our species. It does kill.

There was a vogue for shooting meth (Edit: methedrine, not methamphetamine, IIRC) in the 70s music business. Those groups would pop up and flame out in a matter of a year or two. Quite a number of show business ODs are people shooting mixed crank and opiates.

It does not follow however, that law-enforcement ought to be the front line in defense against it. The legal system has few tools that are of much use in dealing with any drug problems, let alone people who like amphetamines. Generally, use of law-enforcement as a tool to repress unsanctioned drug use leads to a black market and the rise of a well-funded gangster class to service it, and corrupts the legal system too -- all that money.

Part of the problem is that many if not most recreational drugs are cheap and easy to produce, thus offering expansive possiblities for profit, even better than selling water in little plastic bottles.

(Caveat: these are my own views, I claim no sort of official expertise.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The meth stories are NOT overblown
I own a clinic. And our medical staff have all volunteered time at a street level addictions clinic so they are all up on the literature and research.

The fact is that Meth may be the one drug in widespread use that is actually 100% addictive (in terms of changing the basic bio-chemistry of the users permanently) over the course of a life. There have been incidences of people kicking the drug but so far ALL recorded incidences of stopping have so far started to use again. All of them. There is not a single recorded case of permanent remission.

And that is VERY different. This drug, which destroys the pleasure receptors of the brain seems to do so permanently. It seems to be a stone cold, slow death killer.

I would like to thank the US Air force for coming up with the formula. I hope they rot in hell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. How about THESE reasons for Middle American Meth?
1) The people don't have jobs any more. They're all in China and India.

2) The religious faith those people once used to sustain them has been wrecked by the criminal preachers and rapist priests. Those people now realize, like many urban intellectuals, that religion is a fraud and a lie, but they have no philosophies or spiritual concepts with which to replace that old faith. They literally have nothing.

3) They now have satellite TV, and can see that there is plenty of life elsewhere in the world. And they know, for certain, that they are not where any kind of positive action is.

4) The above three reasons are common to just about everybody. Add to them the special sense of doom that haunts the young people in these towns. They know things will never get any better, and will get much worse when they finally have to go to TRY to find work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syntheto Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. The inner city and urban areas have their crack...
...the folks out in the boonies have their meth. Both are what us old-timers would call 'devil's drugs'. I was addicted to meth for one summer in 1982. A close friend (up to this time)pulled a gun on me and threatened to kill me; his brain physically degraded by this harsh chemical. I swore that if I could get away alive, I would never use meth (crank; go-fast) again. I never did, although I had to have my incisors laminated later.

The scary part was dreaming about it for about a year.

Pot is good. Alcohol is not. Meth is not. Coke is okay in powdered form, but here in the Midwest, how are you going to get some decent cocaine? Heroin is evil.

All in all, though, and I've discussed this with my sons, Meth is truly evil; as it changes you. It's as if someone said; "Hey, dude, run this, and you'll become psychotic."

Never tried the rock, but I've heard it's the same thing; you're different after you use it.

Tell me, truly, everyone: just what the fuck is wrong with a nice blunt after a hard day at the mines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC