Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Legal Obligation to Tell Congress About $700M for Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 03:19 PM
Original message
Bush's Legal Obligation to Tell Congress About $700M for Iraq
Here it is, folks! Everything you ever wanted to know about Bush*'s ILLEGAL diversion of funds(the details are available through the link provided):

Bush's Legal Obligation to Tell Congress About $700M for Iraq

April 21, 2004

Since Bob Woodward disclosed that President Bush in July of 2002 diverted $700 million into Iraq invasion planning without informing Congress, the Bush Administration has failed to provide one shred of evidence to rebuff the charge. According to Woodward, Bush kept Congress "totally in the dark on this" leaving lawmakers with "no real knowledge or involvement." Not only does the Constitution vest the power of the purse with Congress, but whichever of the two supplemental bills passed between 9/11 and July 2001 the President drew the money from had explicit language obligating him to inform key congressional leaders.Unfortunately, instead of opening an investigation, White House allies on Capitol Hill actually told USA Today that the move was acceptable because "the $700 million was small compared" with the overall spending bills.

IF THE WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS TO HAVE USED THE POST-9/11 EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL...

BUSH REQUIRED TO TELL CONGRESS, EVEN IF HE USED THE 9/11 SUPPLEMENTAL:
snip


BUSH DELIBERATELY USED VAGUE LANGUAGE IN DOCUMENTS TO HIDE SECRET MOVE
snip


SENATE APPROPRIATIONS CHAIRMAN SAYS WHITE HOUSE NEVER NOTIFIED HIS COMMITTEE
snip


BUSH SAID 9/11 BILL FOR NEW YORK AND CURRENT MILITARY OPERATIONS – NOT IRAQ
snip


IF THE WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS TO HAVE USED THE JULY 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL...

BILL REQUIRED BUSH TO TELL CONGRESS BEFORE MOVING FUNDS
snip


BILL REQUIRED BUSH TO TELL CONGRESS IF FUNDS GIVEN TO FRONTLINE STATES
snip


UNABLE TO PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE THEY EVEN MENTIONED IRAQ TO CONGRESS
snip


THE SUMMER SUPPLEMENTAL WAS SIGNED AFTER SECRET ORDER WAS MADE
snip


full text:
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=46962
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent. Thanks displacedtexan.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sen. Byrd is the key here, which explains the BFEE smear against him.
I wondered where this Byrd smearing was coming from lately. Now, it's obvious: Byrd chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well he may be the ranking minority member but he doesn't chair...
...'til the Dems get the Senate back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. GWB has no stinkin' obligation to tell the Congress nor anyone else
anything he doesn't want to tell: dictators and emperors are just not inclined to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harrumph Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. And yesterday on CNN.....
I heard Wolf Blitzered say the money had been 're-programmed'!! WTF how do you re-program money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC