Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jenny McCarthy, bringer of the Apocalypse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:47 AM
Original message
Jenny McCarthy, bringer of the Apocalypse
Edited on Mon Apr-27-09 11:58 AM by Memekiller
http://www.examiner.com/x-4112-Skepticism-Examiner~y2009m4d26-Jenny-McCarthy-threatens-human-race

It isn't all hyperbole. Jenny McCarthy is a threat to the human race. With the outbreak of the swine flu epidemic, and cases popping up on the US side of the border, few have done more to popularize the anti-vaccination movement. making us more susceptible to a full-blown outbreak.

Unlike in the case of a Christian Scientist denying care to their children, Jenny McCarthy's crucade to stop vaccinations affects us all because to prevent an outbreak. you have to keep a certain percentage of the population immunized:


Yes, Jenny McCarthy endangers us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Imagine a world with safe vaccines. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because a non-existent vaccine could've stopped the current outbreak?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. In the story...
...they mention that the most susceptible appears to be white men, 25-35, usually the least likely to get something. But, they are also the least likely to get flu shots, which is the only thing they can figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Except there is no flu shot for this particular flu....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. but those with the flu shot...
...are less likely to get the swine flu. So, it appears to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. bullshit. it is no help whatsoever. Do you even understand what a vaccine is?
a vaccine is only helpful against the PRECISE VIRUS that has been used in making the vaccine.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Apparently, not BS...
...though, apparently, no longer considered a possibility.

There had been hope that the current seasonal vaccine might do some good, since it contains an H1N1 virus component — meaning the new swine flu strain was at least in the same family of viruses. But the new H1N1 virus is apparently too different for the current vaccine to offer what scientists call "cross protection."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103517402

Hardly impossible, as specific as vaccines may be. It was a possibility seriously being considered by people with medical backgrounds at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Um, no, that's just you extrapolating -- people with actual medical backgrounds aren't claiming this
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. they are, however
less likely to get the secondary infection of flu that might be the killer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Huh? There's a secondary pneumonia that's lethal, in Mexico...
Edited on Mon Apr-27-09 01:33 PM by villager
... no "secondary flu" that some hypothetical shot might have prevented -- had it even been guessed at for one of the previous vaccines...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. there have been 40 cases in the US
how can anyone make a guess on who is most susceptible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good question...
...here's the Washington Post story pinpointing young adult men: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30426170/page/2/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. where did the 'white' come from?
I see nothing about that in the article you link to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That I can't explain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. but you wrote it?
right? is it just that if 25-35 yo white males are more susceptible, it fits into some pandemic myth you have built up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. sorry, but bullshit. obviously don't understand how flu vaccines work
flu vaccines are made a year EARLIER , based on the prevailing strain at that time. As a result, any NEW strain is not covered by the vaccine, even if you got the vaccine.

this is just ignorance masquerading as outrage.

the point is, ANY new flu strain is deadly precisely because its new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Again, read the story...
...the most likely to get the flu are those least likely to get flu vaccinations - so even if it's new, the flu vaccine might have some effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I read the story--the story is wrong, sorry. What I told you is correct.
vaccines take months to develop, and those that make them make a best guess as to what the upcoming strain will be like.

Let me explain it to you in a more simple manner: vaccines are highly specific. Just because you get a vaccine against strain A, you are still completely unprotected from strain Q.

I don't care what the article says, the author is obviously woefully ignorant of how vaccines work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. That may be...
I'm just reiterating what I heard on NPR, which was only a guess. It's been widely reported that the most susceptible may be those usually lest likely to get sick -- young adult males. It's been in Slate, WP and others. Though it's still not know why, on NPR, I believe it was, it was suggested that the only theory anyone has come up with is that it is also the group least likely to get vaccinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. "I'm just reiterating ..." (i.e. spreading unsubstantiated gossip).
So maybe Jenny McCarthy isn't such a threat to life on Planet Earth, after all. Think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. Has Jenny McCarthy come out against developing a Swine Flu vaccine?
If so, got a quote?

:eyes:

What endangers "us all" is the suggestion that A) everyone agree and B) all people respond to medical intervention in the same manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. That may be...
Edited on Mon Apr-27-09 12:17 PM by Memekiller
Wrong post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC