Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Sees Positives In Negative Stand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:19 AM
Original message
GOP Sees Positives In Negative Stand
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/08/AR2009020802344.html?hpid=topnews
Leaders Seize On Spending Issue

Three months after their Election Day drubbing, Republican leaders see glimmers of rebirth in the party's liberation from an unpopular president, its selection of its first African American chairman and, most of all, its stand against a stimulus package that they are increasingly confident will provide little economic jolt but will pay off politically for those who oppose it.

After giving the package zero votes in the House, and with their counterparts in the Senate likely to provide in a crucial procedural vote today only the handful of votes needed to avoid a filibuster, Republicans are relishing the opportunity to make a big statement. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) suggested last week that the party is learning from the disruptive tactics of the Taliban, and the GOP these days does have the bravado of an insurgent band that has pulled together after a big defeat to carry off a quick, if not particularly damaging, raid on the powers that be.

"We're so far ahead of where we thought we'd be at this time," said Rep. Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), one of several younger congressmen seeking to lead the party's renewal. "It's not a sign that we're back to where we need to be, but it's a sign that we're beginning to find our voice. We're standing on our core principles, and the core principle that suffered the most in recent years was fiscal conservatism and economic liberty. That was the tallest pole in our tent, and we took an ax to it, but now we're building it back."

The second-ranking House Republican, Rep. Eric Cantor (Va.), put it more bluntly. "What transpired . . . and will give us a shot in the arm going forward is that we are standing up on principle and just saying no," he said.

(snip)
Democrats scoff at the Republicans' claim to regrouping, saying the declarations against big spending are undermined by the deficits that were run up under Bush and GOP congressional leadership. The stand against the stimulus appeared to be more rejectionist than the discovery of a new approach for moving forward, they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Economic liberty"
We're standing on our core principles, and the core principle that suffered the most in recent years was fiscal conservatism and economic liberty.

Besides his inability to use grammar correctly, the translation is: We believe that rich people should continue to use all the resources the country provides without having to pay any taxes to support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I really don't think that most American voters stand on "core principles"
I think that most people honestly want our leaders to work together, even if that means compromising and giving in a little bit. I think that the Republicans are totally miscalculating that people will respect their stand. People really just want to get something done. If the democrats paint the republicans as pissy obstructionists, they can win this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. is translated to:
"We want only enough government to protect us from our slaves"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another example of why WaPo isn't in the "librul media."
Negative Stand? What the fuck kind of bullshit phrase is that for keeping people out of work, screwing states over who desperately need money, and getting an inane "tax cut" thrown in that won't amount to anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is becoming obvious that congress and Obama need to cut the GOP out of the picture
...and do what needs to be done. Including the republicans will only gum up the works. Fuck them, they had their chance and they destroyed the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's kind of hard to cut the GOP out of the picture when..
.. you are GOP lite yourself, if you
get my drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. We'll be rid of this horrible hangover tomorrow I just know it...now let's have another drink
Yeah they've turned the corner all right :eyes:

the problem for them is that they haven't actually hit rock bottom yet but they are just sure that they don't have to think about it IT'S ALL UP FROM HERE BABY!!! now let's have a drink to celebrate

I doubt that they really believe any of this. They have to put on a public face and this is about all they have right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC