Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Body count mentalities" Colombia's "False Positives" Scandal, Declassified (National Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:21 PM
Original message
"Body count mentalities" Colombia's "False Positives" Scandal, Declassified (National Security
Archive Electronic Briefing Book 266 posted January 7, 2009)

"The CIA and senior U.S. diplomats were aware as early as 1994 that U.S.-backed Colombian security forces engaged in 'death squad tactics', cooperated with drug-running paramilitary groups, and encouraged a 'body count syndrome', according to declassified documents published on the Web today by the National Security Archive."

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB266/index.htm

Some of US had close encounters with domestic death squads utilized by the administration of Richard Milhous Nixon against American citizens and groups on various lists of political enemies.

Subsequent presidential administrations streamlined and refined these murderous political thugs-often financed by the black budget operations derived from places like Colombia.

It's always time to speak the truth and demand accountability for what they did to US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. As always
thank you BtD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well of course they were. That's why they like Uribe so much. He's
THEIR kind of guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. So damned glad you posted this. Looking so very seriously forward to examining it.
1994, eh? Unbearable, isn't it?.

The information on this absolutely evil system should come out NOW, and not decades later in the U.S., instead of keeping it buried as they were able to pull off regarding Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Peru, and all of Central America, and Mexico, as well. So much has been accomplished to beat down and intimidate people in Latin America into total submission, terrified silence, done with our own tax dollars, and the involvement of our own military, training these ghouls right at Ft. Benning, Ga., at the School of the Assassins, and through the initiatives of countless witless, hatred-dripping fools in elected positions in government: scumballs like Jesse Helms, Ronald Reagan, and their loathesome, amoral impersonations of human beings.

Shocked to see this info. coming out now, and as you know there's a MOUNTAIN of other info. behind it which should most clearly be opened, and available to the very people who vote for the politicians, and provide the material resources for them.

From your link, something to make one wonder, considering the fact the Washington Post's Simon Romero's big featur last year was arranged to make it look like this is something he just discovered:
A declassified U.S. Embassy cable describing a February 2000 false positives operation in which both the ACCU paramilitaries and the Colombian Army almost simultaneously claimed credit for having killed two long-demobilized guerrillas near Medellín. Ambassador Curtis Kamman called it “a clear case of Army-paramilitary complicity,” adding that it was “difficult to conclude anything other than that the paramilitary and Army members simply failed to get their stories straight in advance.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's this? They don't want the peasants to have their political and human rights?
They think it sets a "bad precedent"? Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC