Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarke - Guardian Interview - 9/11 Hijackers Could Have Been Stopped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 06:46 AM
Original message
Clarke - Guardian Interview - 9/11 Hijackers Could Have Been Stopped

Clarke - 9/11 Hijackers Could Have Been Stopped


Julian Borger in Washington
Tuesday March 23, 2004
The Guardian

If the Bush White House had heeded warnings in early 2001 about the threat from al-Qaida at least two of the September 11 hijackers would "probably have been caught" and "there was a chance" the attacks could have been prevented, the president's former top counter-terrorism adviser told the Guardian yesterday.

Richard Clarke, who served in the White House for 10 years under three presidents, also claimed that George Bush had come to office already convinced of the necessity to topple Saddam Hussein, and had remained focused on that goal until the invasion last March - when Mr Clarke resigned.

The former counter-terrorism "tsar" also argued that the White House's obsession with Iraq had undermined the military effort in Afghanistan, and helped Osama bin Laden escape.

...

Mr Clarke wrote that when he briefed Ms Rice on al-Qaida, "her facial expression gave me the impression that she had never heard the term before".

...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1175928,00.html


Transcript of the Interview:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1175929,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1175790,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Legs I love
the legs this story has :bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since the Administration knew all of the names, and had most of the photos
of the 9/11 hijackers/murderers immediately after the attacks, wouldn't it stand-to-reason that they could have been stopped! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. That Ms. Rice might not have heard the al-Qaida term before is no surprise
considering her background/expertise was Soviet/Russian-related. From Michael Beschloss's accounts in his 'At the Highest Levels,' Ms. Rice provided GHWB with considerable input as to the Soviet/Russian makeup during the period before the breakup of the Soviet Union: that her expertise was elsewhere is a given but I suspect her apparent failure to have a good handle on the al-Qaida threat was ideological, that is their minds were already made up about Iraq, the focus was there, and the al-Qaida threat was largely ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Maybe not surprising, but it is deeply disturbing.

A top national security official should definitely have already had some knowledge about all major threats to American lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC