Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AWOL on al-Qaida - Eric Alterman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:17 PM
Original message
AWOL on al-Qaida - Eric Alterman
We still have never received an honest accounting of what took place on 9/11, and the media has been remarkably complicit (and complacent) in its pursuit; this is all the more amazing when you consider the fact that this is just about the most written about event in all human history.

AWOL on al-Qaida:  Let’s get this straight before the White House propaganda machine twists it with pretzel logic:  The Bush administration ignored the al-Qaida threat before 9/11 and panicked (WSJ) on 9/11 when confronted by the deed itself.  We still have never received an honest accounting of what took place, and the media—until this Wall Street Journal story--has been remarkably complicit (and complacent) in its pursuit; this is all the more amazing when you consider the fact that this is just about the most written about event in all human history.

I spend a lot of time on this issue in The Book on Bush, but rarely, if ever, have I seen it explained or even addressed.  Take a look at this incredible timeline upon whose sources I relied when I wrote this chapter and see if you can figure out what’s really going on. (Note: When I wrote my Nation column on this topic last year, which is drawn from the book, I did a lousy job of crediting this terrific research.  I made sure to do it in the book, but I regret having failed to so as well in the column.) 

P.S. There’s more here and some of that piece’s sourcing can be found here.

… And Homeland Security, Too.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Pretzel Logic" This is a great one, better than "fuzzy math!"
The word pretzel implies such images as b*sh choking, falling off the couch, mindlessly snacking as a couch potato...

I think Alterman has come up with a gem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Didn't know Alterman is a Steely Dan fan
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Eric loves music and knows the history of many many groups. He's really
and honest, moral, cool guy! Why is there NEVER a Republican who fits the previous sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. The timeline he refers to is paulthompson's, a DU poster!
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 05:36 PM by Old and In the Way
www,cooperativeresearch.org

This was also referenced by the 9/11 Citzen Watch group on C-Span today.

Way to go, Paul! The truth is getting out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. As we say here in New Zealand...
Sweet as! :)

I'm happy to see that because when Alterman came out with an article in the Nation last year, I thought he'd more than a little channeled material I'd written. I'm glad to see he's giving credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of timelines and time lies....
One of the many, many things that I find distressing about the US government's response to 9-11 has been the fact that the events surrounding 9-11 have never been treated with the rigor of a scientific, criminal, forensic, or even an NTSB investigation.

Because the attacks "felt" like an act of war -- BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, BIG, BLOODY, MESSY -- it doesn't seem like much effort was made to undertake painstaking reconstructions. And the fact that dedicated nongovernmental parties are the ones putting so much effort into developing timelines and chronologies says something.

During the early days after 9-11, I don't think the "fuzziness" was necessarily intentional. Afterwards, however, I think the Bush partisans realized that a certain fuzziness about Bush's personal timeline would be a good thing. And so, even today, you have Bush himself and Bush Administration officials making slightly or outright contradictory statements about who took what actions and when.

Finally, all that vague fuzziness has lost its protective value and is now a distinct liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't know
for a long time after the events of 9/11 the atmosphere in America was just that one could not question ANYTHING reagarding 9/11 without risking being called a traitor or labeled as part of the "blame Amercica first" crowd. Then the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq. Now that this so-called war on terror is being seen as the phony war it is, and a disaster at that, all bets are off. We can finally talk about that day and dammit I hope the media finally does their f***ing jobs. There are a lot of unanswered questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC