Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been too much bipartisanship or too little? - Salon.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:46 AM
Original message
Has there been too much bipartisanship or too little? - Salon.com
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 12:03 PM by clear eye
by Glenn Greenwald

snip: "Whatever else one might want to say about "bipartisanship," there is nothing new about it. By definition, it does not remotely constitute "change." To the contrary, the last eight years have been defined, more than anything else, by overarching bipartisan cooperation and consensus."

snip: "Look at every major Bush initiative, every controversial signature Bush policy over the last eight years, and one finds virtually nothing but massive bipartisan support for them -- the Patriot Act (original enactment and its renewal); the invasion of Afghanistan; the attack on, and ongoing occupation of, Iraq; the Military Commissions Act (authorizing enhanced interrogation techniques, abolishing habeas corpus, and immunizing war criminals); expansions of warrantless eavesdropping and telecom immunity; declaring part of Iran's government to be "terrorists"; our one-sided policy toward Israel; the $700 billion bailout; The No Child Left Behind Act, 'bankruptcy reform,' and on and on.

Most of those were all enacted with virtually unanimous GOP support and substantial, sometimes overwhelming, Democratic support: the very definition of 'bipartisanship.'"

More here: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/11/18/bipartisanship/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. When the Republicans are in power, they intentionally and blatantly shut out Democrats
When Democrats are in control, the Republicans whine about a need to 'heal' and the Democrats roll out the red carpet for them. The Dems are milquetoast wimps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck "bipartisianship". Republicans are not Americans.
Anyone who "works" with a Republican is commiting treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Depends how you define "bipartisan"
If you define it the way BushCo and his Congress did (i.e. "bipartisan" meaning they don't budge an inch but talk a couple of Dems into signing on to their agenda), way too much. If you define it the old way, as both sides coming to a genuine compromise, too little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC