I hope it's ok to do this. This is from 3 months ago, it's the conservative Kathleen Parker's last column about Iraq, and she's gloating about it.
Since this column, nothing about Iraq except for one WMD column. Nothing about the disaster that Iraq has become. Her most recent one was about patriotism, but nothing about Iraq or the troops.
Here's the older, gloating one:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/kathleen/parker041403.aspIraqi liberation tastes like crow to antiwar crowd
What was that whimpering sound? Oh that. It's just the "Yes, but" crowd formerly known as the "antiwar pundits." Ignore them.
Saddam's statue had barely hit the ground in central Baghdad before America's armchair doomsayers began harrumphing a new caveat in which to couch this unseemly turn of events. One might almost think they didn't want Saddam to fall.
You couldn't help noticing the careful balance the antis tried to strike between reluctant admission and preachy admonition. The formula goes something like this: "Yes, we defeated Iraq, BUT . . . let's not get too carried away, it ain't over yet."
<more>