Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More U.S. Meddling in El Salvador?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 02:54 PM
Original message
More U.S. Meddling in El Salvador?

By Jacob Wheeler
Salvadoran presidential candidate Mauricio Funes (right), speaks at an April 18 meeting in Panama City.
Share Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine As El Salvador prepares to hold its presidential and parliamentary elections early next year, the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador (CISPES) worries the Bush administration might be drumming up fear to sway results.

During a June visit to El Salvador, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte expressed concern over alleged links between the populist opposition FMLN party — Farabundo Mart’ National Liberation Front — and rebels in Colombia’s FARC — Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

After Colombian troops raided a FARC camp on March 1, the Colombian government alleged it had seized a laptop computer that tied FARC and FMLN. (The FMLN has denied the allegations.)

“Any group that collaborates or expresses friendship with the FARC is not a friend of the United States,” said U.S. Ambassador to El Salvador Charles Glazer, echoing Negroponte’s remarks.

On June 27, Glazer told a delegation of 12 Americans traveling to El Salvador with CISPES that the United States would not interfere with the country’s January parliamentary elections and its March presidential elections. However, CISPES alleges that Glazer also said that the United States had meddled in El Salvador’s 2004 elections.

According to a CISPES press release, “When asked directly if the U.S. government had intervened in the 2004 presidential elections on behalf of the Nationalist Republican Alliance party (ARENA), Glazer replied in the affirmative. When asked if such intervention would occur again, he said ‘no.’ “

Robert Riley, counsel for public affairs at the U.S. embassy, wrote in an e-mail: “Ambassador Glazer acknowledged that certain American officials made public comments in the context of the 2004 Salvadoran elections. … However, did not suggest or ‘confirm’ that the U.S. government intervened in those elections in any way.”

According to Riley, Glazer “has stated numerous times publicly, the U.S. government will not take sides in the upcoming 2009 Salvadoran elections.”

FMLN candidate Mauricio Funes led ARENA candidate Rodrigo Ávila by roughly 6 percentage points, according to a July Reuters poll. If Ávila loses, it would be the first time since the end of El Salvador’s civil war in 1992 that the conservative ARENA party would be out of power.

The United States has played a nefarious role in Salvadoran history, funding and training the right-wing military and death squads that murdered and disappeared 85 percent of the approximately 80,000 victims during the country’s 12-year civil war.

In the run-up to El Salvador’s 2004 election, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) threatened that the United States would stop Salvadoran immigrants from sending remittances to their families if the FLMN party won. Remittances from the United States make up nearly 20 percent of El Salvador’s gross domestic product, and nearly a quarter of all Salvadoran families receive them.

Continued>>
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3926/more_us_meddling_in_el_salvador
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tancredo. What a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC