Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bev Harris and Andy Stephenson in Seattle Weekly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
woofless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:50 AM
Original message
Bev Harris and Andy Stephenson in Seattle Weekly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting and dismaying
concentration on the person of the activists and their "strident" tactics. At the same time, despite a good deal of historical detail it glosses over the various security issues as much if not more than the newspapers. Plainly the writer personally cannot or will not conceive of vote fraud as a possibility nor the tempting easy large scale implications. it invades his comfort zone apparently.

Of course you can't get proof. Newspapers hardly go out of there way to get any either. The concerned political pros who could be demanding facts won't or can't. Meanwhile a lot of smoke fairly screams for accountability and investigation. The list starts with the questionable "gold standard" of paperless touch screen machines with the code owned by a private company as sole proprietor. From there it gets much worse down to documented and glossed over flaws and irregularities in elections of all kinds. Kicking and screaming against the relatively smaller expense of a paper audit is just one warning sign among many. And the Internet voting may be a separate issue, but it has even worse implications, especially as it comes down to the incumbents controlling the Pentagon- the other new arbiter of election counting. "Hacking" IS a provable threat yet it is distraction from what is really hidden and really important.

Anyone sidestepping or missing the point will never stop the secrecy or the insecurity and will enable the pickpocket to take the vote. So far, confronting the target head on is well nigh impossible, the battle over the paper audit being the only contest allowed and that far from being won. The fact that Diebold has lied, illegally used their pieces of crap and gotten their junk recertified with promises of yet more patches? Avert the eyes, change the discussion. Do nothing. They should be under investigation before a Grand Jury.

Still, the issue is blunted enough to save November at least if there is a substantial Kerry victory evident by then. Conspiracy? What do you call Florida 2000? We know what the media calls it and then tries to push Harris into the same mold while clucking over machines and mess and ignoring the crooks and the motivation.

At the end this bemused, somewhat admiring reviewer then gives a personal critique of the message and messenger, somewhat amazed when the common public gets the picture very easily. Never does punditry dare think that the most clueless blinded people are those guarding the gates and the institutions, people like the media and the political and advocacy institutions. THOSE lambs are leading US to the slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC