Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC--"Bush knew months before"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:54 PM
Original message
BBC--"Bush knew months before"
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 09:05 PM by whirlygigspin



Bush 'warned over uranium claim months before'

The CIA warned the US Government that claims about Iraq's nuclear ambitions were not true months before President Bush used them to make his case for war, the BBC has learned.

Doubts about a claim that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African state of Niger were aired 10 months before Mr Bush included the allegation in his key State of the Union address this year, the CIA has told the BBC.

On Tuesday, the White House for the first time officially acknowledged that the Niger claim was wrong and should not have been used in the president's State of the Union speech in January.

But the CIA has said that a former US diplomat had already established the claim was false in March 2002 - and that the information had been passed on to government departments, including the White House, well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech.


Both President Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair mentioned the claim, based on British intelligence, that Iraq was trying to get uranium from Niger as part of its attempt to build a nuclear weapons programme.

Mr Blair is under fire from British MPs about the credibility of a dossier of evidence, which set out his case for war.

And in the US, increasing doubts are being raised about the American use of intelligence.

In his keynote speech to Congress in January, the President said: "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

But the documents alleging a transaction were found to have been forged.

White House spokesman Ari Feischer said on Tuesday: "The president's statement was based on the predicate of the yellow cake from Niger".

"So given the fact that the report on the yellow cake did not turn out to be accurate, that is reflective of the president's broader statement."


But a former diplomat, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, went on the record at the weekend to say that he had travelled to Africa to investigate the uranium claims and found no evidence to support them.

Now the CIA has told the BBC that Mr Wilson's findings had been passed onto the White House as early as March 2002.

That means that the administration would have known before the State of the Union address that the information was likely false - not just subsequently.




http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Andy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. some related links;
Inspectors contradict Blair on evidence of uranium purchase

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,972660,00.html

Ministers knew war papers were forged, says diplomat

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=419982

Cheney and The CIA: Not Business As Usual

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0627-03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. And edit, please
... for copyright, before one of our helpful-yet-firm moderators takes you out to the woodshed. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks for pointing that out!
done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does our "media" understand what a national disgrace it is
that we have to go to the BBC to get information about what our own government is doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, since Wilson "came out" in the Brit press a week
...or was it two weeks, before the NYTimes thing, maybe we should get ready to see this CIA leak come out here in another week or so. Then it will be "real."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC