Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican pattern of stonewalling continues (Concord Monitor editorial re: Palin)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 04:37 PM
Original message
Republican pattern of stonewalling continues (Concord Monitor editorial re: Palin)
September 19, 2008 - 6:56 am


Thirteen people, including Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's husband Todd, have been subpoenaed to appear before Alaska's Senate Judiciary Committee this morning to testify in an investigation initiated by Alaska Republicans into whether Palin improperly sought to fire her former brother-in-law, a state trooper. Palin initially said she would cooperate with the investigation. Once she became the Republicans' vice presidential nominee, that promise was withdrawn. It is unclear whether her husband will cooperate with the investigation.

Should Todd Palin and other witnesses not appear, their refusal should be seen as part of pattern of ignoring subpoenas set by Republicans under President Bush.

Among the former administration officials who have thumbed their noses at Congress are former Bush adviser Karl Rove, former White House counsel Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten, White House chief of staff.

All were subpoenaed to testify about the alleged politically-motivated firings of a dozen U.S. attorneys and a suspect corruption investigation that wrongly led to the imprisonment of Donald Siegelman, Alabama's former governor. All wrongly claim that they are protected from testifying by executive privilege, though only Bolten still works for the president ...

http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080919/OPINION/809190320/1027/OPINION01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. So much for that whole "Rule of Law" thing they cared
so much about back in the early days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC