Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: Reduced Exit Packages Urged for Ousted Executives of Mortgage firms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:15 AM
Original message
Obama: Reduced Exit Packages Urged for Ousted Executives of Mortgage firms
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 11:16 AM by groovedaddy
Senator Barack Obama and two other prominent Democrats urged federal housing regulators on Tuesday to cut the golden parachutes of the ousted leaders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, another sign that the government bailout of those mortgage giants could reverberate through the presidential campaign.

Mr. Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, asked that any “inappropriate windfall payments” to the chief executives and senior managers of those agencies be voided, in a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the new regulator for Fannie and Freddie.

Together, Daniel H. Mudd of Fannie Mae and Richard F. Syron of Freddie Mac are eligible for as much as $24 million in severance, retirement benefits and deferred compensation.

“Under no circumstances should the executives of these institutions earn a windfall at a time when the U.S. Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources,” Mr. Obama wrote.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/business/10comp.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's the guy I want in the White House n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have never understood how executives of tanking companies rate
these kind of bonuses upon their jumping the sinking ship. In this case, our tax dollars will keep these "ships" afloat. But these guys need to be in prison for their performance, not getting millions of dollars!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. In this case, from the OP, by contract.
Deferred compensation--money they could have received before. Probably stock. Sometimes it's to make sure that termination is less likely to happen; sometimes they simply don't take stock options until the end, then it gets rolled into some horribly large lump sum.

Retirement benefits. That doesn't need explaining, I think. Perhaps it would be interesting to look at how they calculate "health benefits" and the total amount to be paid out. Seriously: My ma worked for 30 years, and retired. With retirement came health and pension, much provided by the company. She retired 24 years ago. At $25k/year pension and with health benefits at about the same, that's pushing $1 million she's gotten in benefits. My father worked for the same company, and didn't qualify for post-retirement health insurance; he qualified for a lump sum, which he invested. It would be of interest to see if these guys' retirement amounts are lump sum or assume some sort of long-term payout.

Severance--what you pay when you terminate a contract early, or don't renew. Usually when you do that not "for cause"; "for cause", however, has its own downside ... litigation. Been there, done that. (And, the employee who was terminated got almost exactly the severance he was offered--of course, we were in court for 2 years, and both had rather large legal bills before we settled. Spiteful bastard.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well. the question is, why do they make such deals with morons who destroy the company?
What is the object of such a stupid "deal"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob Dobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. How about PROSECUTING them for their serial criminality?
Is this the kind of hard nosed treatment we can expect from President Obama toward the traitors in busholini inc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. A democratic leader who responds with blog speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. THAT is the change we NEED. GO Barack!
Love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nice Work if You Can Get It - NY Times editorial on this subject
Daniel Mudd and Richard Syron, the ousted chiefs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, could collect as much as $24 million in exit pay (up to $9.3 million for Mr. Mudd and at least $14.1 million for Mr. Syron) unless a federal regulator sensibly says no.

Neither should be rewarded any more than they already have been for their failures.

This is the same Mr. Mudd and Mr. Syron who presided over the near total wipeout of Fannie and Freddie’s shareholders and whose mismanagement of the mortgage-finance companies has led to what could become the biggest federal bailout in American history.

The severance would come on top of $12.4 million in salary, bonuses and stock-option profits that Mr. Mudd has taken home since becoming Fannie’s chief executive in 2004, according to Equilar research. Mr. Syron also made out big, collecting $17.1 million since he took charge of Freddie in 2003.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/opinion/11thu3.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth_ Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Send them to China for judicial processing
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:58 AM by kurth_
They need to rot in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. This just isn't right.
After all, how is a corporate executive going to feed his family on only $8 or $10 million severance, instead of $24 million?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC