Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Court May Immunize Big Pharma

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:36 PM
Original message
High Court May Immunize Big Pharma
The FDA’s new “preemption” doctrine jeopardizes consumers’ right to sue for drug-caused injuries

By Terry J. Allen

Struck by a blinding migraine, Vermont musician Diana Levine went to a clinic where she was injected with the anti-nausea drug Phenergan, produced by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Within weeks, the hand that had fingered her guitar was black with gangrene. Doctors amputated below the wrist and, when that failed to stop the necrosis, removed her forearm.

Wyeth’s label had warned that hitting an artery could cause irreversible damage, but it did not specifically direct physicians to avoid delivering the drug with intravenous (IV) push injection — rather than free-flowing IV drip or intramuscular shot.

Levine sued in Vermont court, charging that, because Wyeth had known for decades that using IV push to inject Phenergan directly into a vein creates avoidable risk, it should have added specific instructions on its label barring the practice.

Wyeth argued that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of Phenergan and its label immunized it from state-level lawsuits. The Vermont court disagreed and awarded Levine $6.8 million.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Wyeth’s appeal on Nov. 3, the day before the presidential election, when few people will be paying attention. They should be.

If Wyeth’s legal defense wins, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said at a hearing in May, “Patients hurt by defective drugs … would no longer have the ability to seek compensation for their injuries.”

MORE...

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3894/high_court_may_immunize_big_pharma/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. This is currently the way it is in Michigan. You can't sue any Pharma for defective drugs. Period.
With all the class-action claims and settlements against the drug companies, Michigan residents can only sit on the sidelines and watch. No relief for us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, but the drug wasn't defective
She should sue her doctor for malpractice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is unconscionable.
The last remaining recourse against an industry that will ALWAYS cut corners, scrimp on research and try to minimize or HIDE problems and contra-indications.....

And this Court, if we're lucky, MIGHT save it 5 - 4. . But I wouldn't take any bets on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. So where are the Big Pharma defenders? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. if there is justice
she will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. this would be fine if the fda stood behind big pharma like they stood behind fnma/fhlmc
well even there it would create nightmarish moral hazard, but at least there'd be compensation for the victims....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turner Ashby Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't think the drug itself was defective.
But the delivery was. So, the hospital or doctor was more likely at fault. So, I am confused by the lawsuit. I had a similar reaction to vistareal, which has a known necrosis factor. I was lucky. I only have a huge scar on my leg, because I got to a hospital fast, and actually threatened them with a lawsuit to react quickly to the dead tissue. (They were trying to ignore the big black patch on my leg that was growing that they had caused).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. the biggest challenge facing this nation is how to . . .
restore citizen authority over corporations . . . and the biggest question facing an Obama administration (assuming there is one) is "will you aggressively work toward this end?" . . .

Reclaim Democracy!
http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth_ Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. The drug companies bought their justices when they bought BushCo
No surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. well there are sharks in the ocean
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 09:42 AM by sui generis
if we don't want big pharma to eat another surfer, we had better do something about the law that makes surfers available as snacks.

Given complete deregulation pharma would REQUIRE that we take their most expensive drugs until several years after being dead and charge your children for breathing air, unless it didn't benefit them economically. That's the key. They are driven, like sharks by hunger, by profit.

go after the lawmakers - sharks aren't evil. People who feed the sharks are evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC