Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: In Central Valley (CA), the Ruins of the Housing Bust

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 10:43 PM
Original message
NY Times: In Central Valley (CA), the Ruins of the Housing Bust
In Central Valley, the Ruins of the Housing Bust

By DAVID STREITFELD
Published: August 23, 2008


MERCED, Calif. - ELLIE WOOTEN, the likable mayor of this likable Central Valley city, is on her way to the office when her cellphone rings. A constituent wants her mortgage payments reduced, and is hoping that the mayor has some clout with her lender.

Although Merced has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country, this borrower isn’t in such dire straits. She’s not even behind on her mortgage. But her oldest daughter is turning 18, which means an end to $500 a month in child support. She just wants a better deal.

The mayor hangs up and shrugs: “It’s a surprise her daughter is turning 18? You’d think she could have planned ahead.”

But hardly anyone in Merced planned very far ahead.

Not the city, which enthusiastically approved the creation of dozens of new neighborhoods without pausing to wonder if it could absorb the growth.

Certainly not the developers. They built 4,397 new homes in those neighborhoods, some costing half a million dollars, without asking who in a city of only 80,000 could afford to buy them all. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/business/24house.html?src=linkedin




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are very stupid people!
In the midst of all the wreckage caused by the real estate boom and bust, some think that they have found a way forward: build more houses, thousands and thousands of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. city coucils and developers have screwed many of us in the central valley
and of course we've had the chance to vote them out. Anyhow most of the developers imo gave kick backs to all kinds of city officials and the building began, things have turned bad and the same developers slink out of town in the middle of the night leaving neighborhoods unfinished and the city holding the bag.

There is a lot of blame to go around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lack of responsible land use planning has plagued Caliornia for years
Now the chickens are coming to roost in hordes. Thing will really get interesting in some of these towns once gas prices rise back up to $6m $8 and $10 per gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Some perspective, from a former resident...
This town recently (last five to seven years) won the tenth University of California campus. That, as well as the general "goldrush" mentality in California real estate superheated the local market--you couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting a real estate developer or a realtor in that town. Unprecedented growth in population was happening. If you were a local, if you didn't buy Real Soon Now, prevailing wisdom was you wouldn't be able to afford to live in your hometown anymore.

What goes up, must come down. And if it went up fast and high, it came down fast and hard. There were overly excited people, and heavy speculation regarding land and hoursing values due to the UC and business doing unusually well there. Nothing stupid, as much as it was short sighted.

Hope this clears things up.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. They Never Considered How Much It Costs To
Convert an urban subdivision back into farmland.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC