Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Was a Warning .... seismologist on the importance of bracing for the Big One

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:40 PM
Original message
This Was a Warning .... seismologist on the importance of bracing for the Big One
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 12:46 PM by RedEarth
The 5.4 magnitude earthquake that struck near Los Angeles yesterday just before noon was felt as far east as Las Vegas and as far south as San Diego. Since the quake, whose epicenter was about 28 miles southeast of Los Angeles near the affluent suburb of Chino Hills and 8.5 miles beneath the Earth's surface, there have been nearly 50 aftershocks, most of them small, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Although the quake was one of the strongest to hit urban Southern California since the deadly 6.7 magnitude Northridge quake in 1994, it didn't cause any severe damage or major injury. So Southern California residents are exhaling with relief—that for now, they've eluded The Big One.

But seismologists, who've concluded that this jolt was not tied directly to any of Southern California's major fault lines, insist it could have been much more destructive and that it was just a reminder that the big one is indeed still looming. Graham Kent, a seismologist and geophysicist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, studies the complex series of fault lines that run beneath California's surface. NEWSWEEK'S Jamie Reno spoke with Kent about this quake and the threat that possible future quakes pose to Southern California. Excerpts:

........

Does this quake give us any clues about future Southern California quakes in terms of when or where?
We tell people it's a very low probability that an earthquake like this might be a foreshock, but I think the more responsible way of looking at it is that this quake is a reminder. The L.A. Basin is fraught with potential hazards, the thrusting event as well as the large strike event, and we've been lucky. The San Andreas Fault on average ruptures every 150 to 200 years over the last several thousand years, and it has not ruptured for about 340 years. So every morning we wake up we set a new record between large ruptures.

Would you say Los Angeles dodged a bullet with this event?
Yes, thrust faults than can be a 7-ish event, this one got up to 5.4. But the point is they are there and people need to be prepared. The way I look at events like this, other than making our afternoon crazy, is that this is really just a strong reminder to people that earthquakes can and will occur in this region that are 100 times larger in energy; some day the big one will in fact occur. These are reminders to people to be prepared with food and water. Have your wall units bolted. Do your kids know where to go? People throughout Southern California should have all of this already planned. Unfortunately, people don't ask us about this stuff when we don't have an earthquake, so during times like these we use you to answer the public's questions and remind them that we need to be prepared.



http://www.newsweek.com/id/149525
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. the LA stations always add the reminder that this (or any other quake)
may be a foreshock to the legendary BIG one. That is only locally broadcast. We still have family in LA, and we're always watching for news of quakes. If the big one does hit, I wouldn't want to have to deal with the problems that area faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Phew. I'm so glad that wasn't a sex thread...
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC