Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Readin', writin', 'rithmetic, loyalty oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 06:57 AM
Original message
Readin', writin', 'rithmetic, loyalty oath
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/02/29/Columns/Readin___writin____ri.shtml

By ROBYN E. BLUMNER, St. Petersburg Times
Published February 29, 2004

Let's talk about the Pledge of Allegiance. How much do you really know about it? I dare say few of us left school without being introduced to the national anthem's Francis Scott Key. Yet, most of us recited the pledge at the start of every school day without knowing much about its provenance.

This year, in a case that has generated more raw emotion than a Jimmy Swaggart repentance, the U.S. Supreme Court will determine whether the pledge is constitutionally viable. Michael Newdow, a father, lawyer and atheist, challenged the recitation of the pledge in his young daughter's public school classroom. Newdow objects to the words "under God," claiming, logically, that the phrase is an expression of religious conviction - a belief in a deity - and therefore violates the separation of church and state. Amazingly, a federal appellate court agreed; and the government's appeal is set for argument before the Supreme Court on March 24.

There is no getting around the historical fact that the phrase "under God" was intended as an overt statement of religious belief. It was inserted by Congress in 1954 - fully 62 years after the pledge was written - purposely to proclaim the United States a "believer" nation in sharp contrast to the official atheism of the Soviet Union. An intellectually honest court would say that professing a belief in a deity as part of a daily ritual in our public schools violates the Bill of Rights. Though, if the high court required the words "under God" to be excised, the resulting political uproar would lead to the passage of a "pledge protection" constitutional amendment faster than you could say "Tom DeLay."

Either way, this is not going to end well for liberty.

More
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I LOVE the St. Pete Times. Such a reasoned and well-written paper,
Edited on Sun Feb-29-04 08:21 AM by Nay
as opposed to the rag I am forced to read now (Richmond Times-Dispatch).

St. Pete Times was what we read when I grew up in FL and it was a great newspaper then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC