Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Democrats might vote for John Kerry, BUT...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:26 PM
Original message
Ohio Democrats might vote for John Kerry, BUT...
www.theotherpaper.com

Ohio Democrats might vote for John Kerry,
but they'll be thinking about John Edwards


By Dan Williamson / February 26, 2004

Ann Tormet

The smile of a movie star, the caution of a frontrunner: Edwards at the Ohio Union Sunday

Arca Lucas cast her first vote for president at age 21 to re-elect President Franklin Roosevelt in 1936. She will cast her next one for John Edwards in Tuesday's Ohio Democratic Primary, and she's just tickled about it.

A cheerful woman wearing a button that strategically added the letters "LL" and "IT" to the word "BUSH," Lucas excitedly awaited Edwards's arrival in the West Ballroom of the Ohio Union Sunday afternoon.

"I think he's tops," she gushed. If elected, Edwards would be the second handsomest United States president in history, she said: "Next to John Kennedy."

"I liked him the first time I saw him," Lucas said of Edwards. "He has a pleasant personality.

"And that smile."

She's right. Whatever else you might say about Edwards, he has a damn good smile.

He knows it, too, which you can tell by the way he teases his audience with it after one of the surefire applause lines in his stump speech.

First he'll feign a serious facial expression while nodding slowly and knowingly. That look will give way to a sly, self-assured grin. Then he gives the people what they want: those gleaming pearly whites.

Edwards will savor the moment by rubbing his hands together or massaging his chin. If it's a really good applause line—like when he boasted about how he whipped up on corporate attorneys back when he was a litigious trial lawyer—he'll punctuate the routine with three thumbs-up pumps of his right fist.

If it's an even better one—like when he boasted about how he whipped up on incumbent Republican Sen. Lauch Faircloth in 1998—he'll do the three thumbs-up pumps with both fists.

Compare Edwards's stage presence to that of the Democratic frontrunner, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. Kerry calls out his applause lines as if he were standing on a balcony somewhere reading them to the masses from a scroll.

And Kerry has a terrible smile. It comes awkwardly out of nowhere and disappears just as quickly. Kerry doesn't look like a guy who's used to smiling. He's more natural when he appears forlorn.

All of this helps explain why, though Kerry is the candidate they'll probably go home with, Democrats want to dance a little longer with Edwards.

Mayor Mike Coleman, whose own endorsed candidate, retired Gen. Wes Clark, dropped out of the race two weeks ago, took Edwards to church with him Sunday morning. A handful of Democratic elected officials who haven't endorsed Edwards—including City Council President Matt Habash, county Treasurer Rich Cordray and county Commissioner Mary Jo Kilroy—beamed as they sat in the front row for Sunday's Ohio Union speech.

They may end up voting for Kerry Tuesday, but they'll tell their kids they voted for Edwards.

Hot or not, Kerry remains the favorite to win Ohio Tuesday. Of the 10 states that will vote in next week's Super Tuesday primaries, Ohio is one of only three—New York and Georgia are the others—in which Edwards is campaigning. Badly trailing Kerry in the delegate count, Edwards needs to win somewhere or get out of the race.

And since he's the last man standing among Kerry's challengers, nobody wants that to happen.

Therefore, Edwards has been assigned the role of the surging underdog.

Surging is a curious term to describe a guy who has lost 10 straight primary states since his sole victory in his native South Carolina Feb. 3. But when Edwards finished a surprisingly strong second in Wisconsin Feb. 17, it gave political reporters something to grab onto. After all, they have to write about something.

Each presidential election year, the political intelligentsia invest their hopes and dreams in at least one candidate who probably isn't going to win. From Gary Hart in 1984 to John McCain in 2000, there's a proud tradition of fawning over an underdog, if only to postpone the monotony of talking about the two parties' nominees.

A year ago, it appeared the surging underdog would be former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, but then he became the frontrunner himself. So the mantle briefly went to Wes Clark, but he failed to surge.

Edwards, meanwhile, was viewed as something of a lightweight. His nickname, the "Breck Girl," was so well known that his campaign handed out bottles of Breck shampoo at his presidential announcement speech last year.

His defining moment as a U.S. senator was when Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York outmaneuvered him for floor-speech minutes while the Senate was debating the authorization resolution on the impending invasion of Iraq.

"Just stand there and look pretty, John," Clinton reportedly quipped before making her speech. Edwards marched out of the chambers.

But that was then, and this is now.

Edwards has outlasted would-be heavyweights Dean, Clark, Joe Lieberman and Dick Gephardt. He's also turned out to be an energetic campaigner and a gifted speaker

And, well, there's that smile.

"I'm going to be voting for Edwards," said Jessica Maggard, a young Ohio House legislative assistant who was dressed in an "I STILL HATE GEORGE BUSH" T-shirt Sunday.

She said she likes Edwards's charisma and the fact that he's from the South. And, yeah, he's really cute.

"I think his looks help him," she said. "I think it helps me like him."

And whether or not John Kerry has had Botox injections in his face—he has denied it—Maggard said he doesn't hold a candle to Edwards.

Botox? Kerry, she said, "needs more help than that."

With a clear mission of prolonging the presidential primary season, Ohio political reporters set out this week to get to know—and, if possible, inflate the political viability of—this Edwards fellow.

They imagined themselves sitting on Edwards's campaign bus, listening to Edwards spin tales of his legal adventures in that charming Carolina twang. The senator certainly seems like a friendly sort. Maybe they'd become friends.

As it turns out, however, Edwards—unlike the chatty, unscripted McCain of four years ago—likes his encounters with the press tightly controlled. Rather than leap at every chance to get his name out, as you'd expect from a guy with only one primary victory to his name, Edwards is behaving like a cautious frontrunner who's sitting on a lead.

A small band of reporters who were invited by the mayor's office to talk to Edwards at Coleman's home learned this when the candidate's van showed up half an hour late.

"We goin' to church?" Edwards asked as he gave a hearty handshake to the mayor and a hug to Frankie Coleman. After a brief discussion inside the house, Edwards marched right past the gaggle, declared, "Great to be in Columbus!" and hopped right back into the van.

Things didn't get better at the Ohio Union rally, where reporters from the Associated Press and PBS were overheard grousing about the challenge of completing their stories without access to the candidate.

Following Edwards's speech, he was made available for a closed-door session with reporters chosen from four media outlets: the three Columbus TV stations and Dispatch political writer Joe Hallett.

A few Ohio Statehouse reporters who ventured to the third-floor Ohio Union interview room were met by a withering glare from local PR operative Jan Allen, who was guarding the door like a sentry.

When Edwards emerged, he was quickly surrounded by aides who hustled their man to a nearby elevator. When Jeff Ortega, an unfailingly polite reporter for Dix Newspapers, made a last-ditch attempt to approach the candidate, one of Edwards's body men menacingly warned him to step away from the elevator.

"He's not taking any more questions," the man snapped.

But he sure looked pretty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny. No mention of Kucinich.
You'd think the pundits would at least credit him his home state. I hate the RW media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
einniv Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ohioan for Kucinich here!!
Yeah he isn't even getting much coverage in the local media either :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually...
..."The Other Paper" isn't the RW media. It wrote a very scathing article about GWB in its last issue. It didn't mention Dennis because he wasn't in Columbus campaigning last weekend -- these two were -- it's a local newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katieforeman Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. they should vote for John Edwards
Please read this before you vote:
Although I like John Kerry and will support him if he is the nominee, he may be the most vulnerable candidate on defense issues. Republicans will use his voting record on defense and foreign policy to attack him for being weak on defense and to portray him as a flip-flopper who can't be trusted to make the tough decisions necessary to lead us in difficult times.

If John Kerry is the nominee watch for over $200 million dollars worth of ads like these:

John Kerry, "He's been wrong for 32 years. He's wrong now."
(from Washington Post 2-20-04 on plans by Bush's advertising team.)

-1970 Kerry said that US troops should be deployed, "only at the directive of the United Nations." (Washington Post 2-20-04)

-1997 on the Senate floor, Kerry asked why the nation's "vast intelligence apparatus continues to grow even as government resources for essential priorities fall short."(NYTimes 1-28-04)

-After Sept. 11th on Face the Nation, "The tragedy is, at the moment, that the single most important weapon for the United States of America is intelligence, and we are weakest, frankly, in that particular area." (NYTimes 1-28-04)

-1980's Kerry was against death penalty for terrorists. Now he's for it.

-1991 Kerry said he voted against the first Gulf War resolution because he feared that if he voted to authorize the use of force Bush 1 would fail to pursue all other alternatives first.

-2003 Kerry voted for the Iraq War Resolution and then complained that Bush 2 rushed to war without exhausting all other options.

Zell Miller told Newsweek that, "Kerry's voting record is terrible on defense." The Republicans are going to list all of the weapons systems he voted against which have since been used to save American lives in the Iraq wars. They are going to cite all of his votes to cut intelligence and defense.

"John Kerry is a hypocrite" (from same Washington Post article cited above.)
This line will be followed by examples of Kerry's 19 years in the Senate taking special interest money. Republicans will use this to nuetralize one of Bush's main liabilities. Voters will think both Kerry and Bush are the same when it comes to special interests, only Kerry is a hypocrite about it. Just the other day the Washington Post published an article about Kerry accepting contributions from the CEOs of companies Kerry had called Benedict Arnolds.

Everything they did to Dukakis, they will do to Kerry. Remember Kerry was Lt. Governor during Dukakis' infamous parole program. They will paint Kerry as an out-of-touch elitist with a voting record more liberal than Ted Keneddy's and filled with votes for tax increases.

Bottom line: Kerry's experience is a huge liability. Republicans will paint him as a career politician who changes positions to go with the political tide.

What do they have on Edwards?

-He was a trial lawyer? But that didn't work in NC and it is impossible to attack him on that without attacking his very sympathetic clients.

-He is inexperienced? John Edwards has more foreign policy experience than Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush 2 when they were elected President. Edwards is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and was one of the first Senetars to travel to Afghanistan after the war. He has actually met with Musharif and other leaders from the region. Bush couldn't even name the leader of Pakistan in the 2000 campaign. Furthermore, it's difficult to maintain that Bush did a good job despite his initial inexperience while at the same time maintaining that Edwards is too inexperienced.

Bush 1 found that the "Clinton is too inexperienced argument was a looser." And Bush 2 will find the same thing.

Some people think that Kerry's heroic Vietnam service when contrasted with Bush's AWOL record with the National Guard will help Kerry in November. However, a recent Gallup poll showed that 80% of Americans said this will not be relevant to their voting decision. The 15% who did care were mostly Democrats who would never vote for Bush anyway. Besides do we really want this election to be centered around a divisive issue of the past like Vietnam? We have already milked this issue for about as much as it is worth, and are at risk of a backlash if we push it too much further.

A John Edwards campaign would be focused on the future and what type of America we want to live in. This is a debate the Democrats will win.

Thanks for taking the time to read this message. Forward it to anyone you think might be interested.

Please get out and vote for Edwards on Tues. Bring your friends and family with you. If we give John Edwards the nomination, he'll give us the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katieforeman Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Edwards is much more than a pretty face

Here are a few reasons to vote for Edwards:

John Edwards can do for Democrats what Reagan did for Republicans- articulate a coherent philosophy of government and define a vision that inspires a generation. Remember Reagan had his shining city on a hill. John Edwards has the dream of One America. Kerry and Edwards both have some very good policy ideas, but John Edwards is the only one who puts all of these policies within the context of a unified vision. A generation later we are still dealing with the Reagan true believers. John Edwards will create a generation of true believers in Progressive causes.

John Edwards has all of the hallmarks of a very popular President. His coattails will likely be longer. Because he is so articulate and likeable, John Edwards is the candidate best able to make effective use of the bully pulpit. Furthermore, a popular President has much more leverage with Congress and is more effective at pushing his agenda. Remember how cowed Democrats were when Bush was riding high.

John Edwards is the best candidate to help improve the tone of political debate in this country. He has a future-oriented, positive vision. An Edwards victory would demonstrate that it is possible to win without engaging in the politics of personal destruction.

Kerry's "bring em on" attitude is a mistake. First, it lets Republicans frame the debate. Second, Republican negative attacks are less effective against a positive, future oriented candidate.

If John Edwards is the nominee, the Progressive vision will be at the center of the debate. If Kerry is the nominee, the debate will be framed around divisive issues of the past like Kerry's voting record and Vietnam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC