Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama may retain defence chief Robert Gates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
captainmorgan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:39 AM
Original message
Barack Obama may retain defence chief Robert Gates
Source: The Sunday Times (UK)

June 29, 2008
Sarah Baxter in Washington


In defiance of traditional party labels, Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, may ask the defence secretary of President George W Bush to stay on if he wins the White House.

Obama’s top foreign policy and national security advisers are pressing the case for keeping Robert Gates at the Pentagon after he won widespread praise for his performance. The move would be in keeping with Obama’s desire to appoint a cabinet of all the talents.

After appealing for unity with former rival Hillary Clinton and her supporters and big donors last week, Obama, 46, is turning his attention to wooing Republicans and independent voters who may be concerned that he lacks the experience to be trusted with America’s defence.

Richard Danzig, an adviser to Obama on national security and a former navy secretary, said: “My personal position is Gates is a very good secretary of defence and would be an even better one in an Obama administration.”

Read more:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4232070.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093


Read more: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4232070.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. 'May' ask? Is this an opinion of the writer's? He 'may not' ask, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captainmorgan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He quoted Richard Danzig, Obama's key foreign policy adviser
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 08:47 AM by captainmorgan
Richard Danzig, an adviser to Obama on national security and a former navy secretary, said: “My personal position is Gates is a very good secretary of defence and would be an even better one in an Obama administration.”

Plus Obama himself mentioned Danzig's name when asked by the NY Times a while ago which expert he would consult with:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/us/politics/02obama-transcript.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks. Danzig's personal opinion 'might' count for something.
Myself, I'll wait to see how this shakes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gigaware Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Another Obama adviser, Ivan Daalder, agreed with Danzig
From the article:

16MY6TEIvo Daalder of the Brookings Institution in Washington, a foreign policy adviser to Obama, said: “Robert Gates is one of the best defence secretaries we have had in a long time and it makes a lot of sense to keep him.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. OK, thanks. Any word on what Susan Rice might think? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. While I personally have no idea in hell if Obama would retain
Gates, I personally hope he chooses not to.

There are scores of others who would be far better choices, plus it is an important symbolic act to clear out the appointees of the Bush era, plus there's the added political benefit of strengthening your position through smart, new, strategic appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. no goddamn chance in hell
Gates goes.

I'm stopping contributions to the Obama campaign until I start hearing something from his organization worth contributing to.

Meanwhile, there are plenty of folks that want to be US senator who share my views. They will get my direct contribution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. testimony to just how much power this junta has over the election process and the government
they are going dress our guy up in a nazi uniform by election time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's happening before my eyes, within a week's time
truly breathtaking.

Thanks for your insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. I don't understand your reference to "junta."
Would you please explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. So where is your top five better choice list ? As you know
you can e mail your better picks right to the Obama website. They have an open door policy and take input from many sources.

I bet Barak doesn't need your vote if your not willing to hear him out as to why he would carry over a defense pick.

As I recall, there was a Clinton holdover put into building the bushco cabinet

but


nobody wanted to hear his opinions as I recall......

jmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I work on a US army base in Europe
I would be happy to discuss with Obama why I think Gates needs to leave, not only Gates, but layer upon layer of Bush appointees that is bone-deep.

Obama's coming to Europe. I am hoping he will hold an open forum so the topic of "Bush's Political Nepotism and the Peter Principle" can be discussed.

As Markos said on Obama, "We have no other choice." We're involved in a six year invasion and "We have no other choice."

I do have the choice of contributions, however, and I choose no longer to contribute to Obama. I'll give money to senate candidates of choice while voting for Obama. I hope Obama is comfortable with that....he has my vote, not my money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. let Bush stay in the White House too,what the hell.Obama can commute.
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 09:42 AM by Algorem
they can be co-unitary executive.

this two-party stuff is "just rhetoric" anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. The more things CHANGE, the more they stay the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. well, there is the theory that true power is held by a select few families... Kinda puts a Mugabe
election results into a different light after all these years.

UN 'regrets' Zimbabwe election

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7478757.stm


'Big Mugabe win' in Zimbabwe poll




http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7479853.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Arrgh, DU. Got a little captain in ye?
Not any longer, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Cabinet of talents? The only things republicans are talented at is lying, corruption,
greed, and incompetence.
:puke:
Haven't we seen enough? Haven't we had enough?
:puke:
We desperately need genuine change, not the same people that have been supporting Bu*h in deliberately destroying our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not a bad idea. Gates is VERY well-regarded by the military, and is seen
as competent and effective. He does what Chimpy asks him to do, but he would also accomplish what Obama asks him to do just as well--he does not seem to have an ideology or political agenda the way Rumsfeld did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. The Secretary of Defense must take orders from the President
If Gates will do that with President Obama, and do it well, he may be a good candidate to stay on. If not, he needs to be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Gates wanted to bomb Nicaragua
Robert Gates is the man who wanted to bomb Nicaragua, for crying out loud! All because it wouldn't elect a President to his liking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Who was the president at the time?
Would it be more accurate to say that the President wanted to bomb Nicaragua, and Gates was working for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. Sweep the scum out
The fact that ANYBODY has a position in the Bush Administration means that they did something to curry Bush's favor. NOBODY gets into BushCo with competence being a significant factor.


Gates did SOMETHING to make Bush like him, and he will continue to do it under Obama. Things like, perhaps, leaking information to conserative think-tanks or politicians, or manipulating things behind the scenes for defense contractors.


Sweep the scum out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. The keyword here is "may".
I "may" win the Powerball lottery, but then I "may" not (I didn't last night). OK, so that's unlikely anyways.

I "may" mow my lawn today, but, then again, I "may" not. It might rain or more likely I just don't feel like it.

"May" is a long way from being a done deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. What was that line said so often?
Change? So much for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. Why Would Gates Want The Job
Perhaps to become a real Secretary of Defense? Dick Cheney is the current functioning Secretary of Defense.

Such a move would set up a huge conflict of interest for Gates. It would be unethical for him to disclose personal converations with President Bush. Would Gates be onboard for a fairly rapid withdrawal of American forces from Iraq. He did, after all, support the surge.

A still bigger conflict will exist at CentCom where Gen. Petraeus will be stationed when Barack Obama call for a reversal of his policy. This could set up a Truman/MacArthur type of Commander in Chief battle with the politically active Gen. Petraeus. The top command of the military has been loaded with Bush loyalists. Obama will have his hands full dealing with this group where being a yes man was all important to survival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyounkin Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. LOL
I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
27. Robt. Gates of "The October Surprise" . . . maybe Obama will ask Bush to stay on????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
28. Gates is the only part of administration
that can seemingly find his ass with both hands. I don't have a problem with him continuing on as SoD since he appears to be highly competent and is well respected by the military, unlike the buffoon that preceded him. Of course an untrained monkey would appear to be a genius compared to old "Rummy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. I hope not
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 11:30 AM by Magleetis
I draw no distinction between the evil shrub and the people who support and/or work for him. They have no regard for human life or the rule of law. This is not what I want to hear coming from Obama. I am holding out hope that American democracy isn't a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I think you've identified the key take-home concept here
They're all a clear and present danger to human life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. That would be a continuation of the same business.
Here's some info on Gates:

-snip-

"Gates was first nominated to be the director of Central Intelligence in 1987 by Ronald Reagan, who was known as the Great Delegator (which may mean that Gates was really nominated by George H. W. Bush assisted by James Baker), at the height of the controversy over the criminal sale of arms to Khomeini and transfer of money to the Contras. But Gates, facing rejection, withdrew.4 Tom Polgar, a CIA station chief and staffer on the Senate Select Committee on Iran-Contra, wrote in an op-ed piece, "My objections to Gates center on his performance during the Iran-contra affair.... Throughout it, Gates acted as if he was in a complete fog or was interested primarily in keeping the truth from being aired in public or from reaching Congress."5 During Iran-Contra Gates was CIA deputy director for intelligence, then deputy director of Central Intelligence (hence the number two man), and finally the acting director. Gates was close to Iran-Contra figures and in a strong position to know about what was going on. Although Gates was an early target of investigation, Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh ultimately decided not to prosecute Gates for perjury without stronger evidence. It appears that Gates tried to protect the Agency and leave aggressive criminal activity to Col. Ollie North and company, but that Gates dissembled and suffered “recall failures” under oath before the Grand Jury."

-snip-

"Perhaps the most consistent trait of the Bush bunch is secrecy, although loyalty runs a close second.16 Robert M. Gates has both traits. A little-known outrage for our so-called republic happened on Nov. 1, 2001, when President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13233, ordering that a former president's private papers can be released only with the approval of both the current and former president (or his heirs). Since the Reagan-Bush administration had a “stop the clock” granted, new Iran-Contra evidence can be withheld indefinitely, protecting Bush 41 and Gates from further revelations. Prior to Bush 43’s new secrecy order, the National Archives had controlled the release of documents under the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which stipulated that all papers, except those pertaining to national security, had to be made available 12 years after a president left office. The new Democrat-controlled Congress must contest this usurpation of law. If it succeeds, new Iran-Contra revelations will scandalize Gates, Bush 41 and many others."

http://www.nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=getting_to_know_gates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Obama may not be in a position to "keep him on".
Gates opposes bombing Iran, as did head of CENTCOM Admiral Fallon.

Fallon's being replaced by Petraeus.

I expect to see Gates resign soon, either willingly in protest of Bush's last hurrah, or as the result of a squeeze out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Do you have a link that shows Gates' opposition to attacking Iran? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Of course there is no official pronouncement from Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. How about Gary Hart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
37. labels?
You mean all of this was just about "labels?"

"In defiance of traditional party labels..."

Here I thought that the wealthy and powerful few were waging all out war on the people, and winning, and that the Democratic party would defend us and fight back on our behalf.

But it was just about "labels" and nothing of any substance, I guess.

Rather than defying the predatory and authoritarian people who are dismantling our country and impoverishing and terrorizing the rest of us, we will be defying "labels" now.

But won't those "labels" get angry at being defied, and might they not say bad things about us and hurt our chances of winning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. interesting comments left at the bottom of this "Op Ed" article

The Bush presidency taught us that there are risks of electing a person about whom we know little. At least Bush had some experience governing. Obama has no experience and has revealed only a talent for expressing nice sentiments. If I want nice sentiments, I'll buy a greeting card.

Jock Gleason, mclean, usa

Yes, his total of 2 years in government is showing, yet the Times love-fest of Obama continues. There are so many signs of this mans total lack of ability but all the neo-communists continue to love him. Hes like a Hollywood star. Smooth talking, a good actor but no substance to back it up.

William, Atlanta, USA

Can we trust him?

He has already changed horses in mid-stream when he went back on his word. In the beginning of his campaign he said he would take money from the presidential fund.

Now he is not going to take money from the presidential funds.

Can we trust anything he says?

Colleen , Hickory Creek, Texas, USA,

Obama is just smart. There's no sense trying to down play that. What I'm hoping is that we can get traditional thinking kicked out the door and try something exactly like this . You go Obama. President Obama, sounds good to me.

Luke, LA,



True Obama is no troll
where, as they say, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. Probably a head-fake.
I doubt he'd keep Gates on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. We must have a 'puke Secretary of Defense in a Democratic administration, someone who is tough
on the commie threat, terra, and crime at home considering the military's present role in domestic matters. No softie libral in this job, no siree. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC