June 29, 2008
WHEN ASKED about the effect of another terrorist attack on American soil, John McCain's chief strategist, Charlie Black, responded rashly and bluntly. "Certainly it would be a big advantage" for McCain, Black told Fortune magazine recently. Similarly, the strategist described the assassination of Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto in December as "an unfortunate event," but said "it helped us" in the contest for the nomination ...
Is Black right to assume that McCain would benefit politically after another terrorist atrocity in the United States? The subject came up when the Fortune interviewer first asked McCain "what single economic threat he perceives above all others" and McCain, after a long silence, said: "Well, I would think that the absolute gravest threat is the struggle that we're in against radical Islamist extremism."
Perhaps McCain is merely determined to stay on message, so much so that he answers an economics question from a business magazine with a non sequitur that is supposed to play to his ostensible strength, national security. Or perhaps McCain would rather not talk about foreclosures, the credit crisis, disappearing jobs, healthcare, and tax policy - economic issues in which Republican dogma and public sentiment diverge significantly ...
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/06/29/the_same_old_politics_of_terror/