Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the government compiling a secret list of citizens to detain under martial law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 10:58 AM
Original message
Is the government compiling a secret list of citizens to detain under martial law?
ARE YOU ON THE LIST? The federal government has been developing a highly classified plan that will override the Constitution in the event of a major terrorist attack


In the spring of 2007, a retired senior official in the U.S. Justice Department sat before Congress and told a story so odd and ominous, it could have sprung from the pages of a pulp political thriller. It was about a principled bureaucrat struggling to protect his country from a highly classified program with sinister implications. Rife with high drama, it included a car chase through the streets of Washington, D.C., and a tense meeting at the White House, where the president's henchmen made the bureaucrat so nervous that he demanded a neutral witness be present.

The bureaucrat was James Comey, John Ashcroft's second-in-command at the Department of Justice during Bush's first term. Comey had been a loyal political foot soldier of the Republican Party for many years. Yet in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, he described how he had grown increasingly uneasy reviewing the Bush administration's various domestic surveillance and spying programs. Much of his testimony centered on an operation so clandestine he wasn't allowed to name it or even describe what it did. He did say, however, that he and Ashcroft had discussed the program in March 2004, trying to decide whether it was legal under federal statutes. Shortly before the certification deadline, Ashcroft fell ill with pancreatitis, making Comey acting attorney general, and Comey opted not to certify the program. When he communicated his decision to the White House, Bush's men told him, in so many words, to take his concerns and stuff them in an undisclosed location.

The Continuity of Governance program encompasses national emergency plans that would trigger the takeover of the country by extra-constitutional forces. In short, it's a road map for martial lawComey refused to knuckle under, and the dispute came to a head on the cold night of March 10, 2004, hours before the program's authorization was to expire. At the time, Ashcroft was in intensive care at George Washington Hospital following emergency surgery. Apparently, at the behest of President Bush himself, the White House tried, in Comey's words, "to take advantage of a very sick man," sending Chief of Staff Andrew Card and then–White House counsel Alberto Gonzales on a mission to Ashcroft's sickroom to persuade the heavily doped attorney general to override his deputy. Apprised of their mission, Comey, accompanied by a full security detail, jumped in his car, raced through the streets of the capital, lights blazing, and "literally ran" up the hospital stairs to beat them there.

Minutes later, Gonzales and Card arrived with an envelope filled with the requisite forms. Ashcroft, even in his stupor, did not fall for their heavy-handed ploy. "I'm not the attorney general," Ashcroft told Bush's men. "There"—he pointed weakly to Comey—"is the attorney general." Gonzales and Card were furious, departing without even acknowledging Comey's presence in the room. The following day, the classified domestic spying program that Comey found so disturbing went forward at the demand of the White House—"without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality," he testified.

What was the mysterious program that had so alarmed Comey? Political blogs buzzed for weeks with speculation. Though Comey testified that the program was subsequently readjusted to satisfy his concerns, one can't help wondering whether the unspecified alteration would satisfy constitutional experts, or even average citizens. Faced with push-back from his bosses at the White House, did he simply relent and accept a token concession? Two months after Comey's testimony to Congress, the New York Times reported a tantalizing detail: The program that prompted him "to threaten resignation involved computer searches through massive electronic databases." The larger mystery remained intact, however. "It is not known precisely why searching the databases, or data mining, raised such a furious legal debate," the article conceded.

Another clue came from a rather unexpected source: President Bush himself. Addressing the nation from the Oval Office in 2005 after the first disclosures of the NSA's warrantless electronic surveillance became public, Bush insisted that the spying program in question was reviewed "every 45 days" as part of planning to assess threats to "the continuity of our government."
Few Americans—professional journalists included—know anything about so-called Continuity of Government (COG) programs, so it's no surprise that the president's passing reference received almost no attention. COG resides in a nebulous legal realm, encompassing national emergency plans that would trigger the takeover of the country by extra-constitutional forces—and effectively suspend the republic. In short, it's a road map for martial law.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9238




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. The new Alien and Sedition Acts need an implementation plan:
Operation End Game:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Endgame

The official explanation:

http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dhs/endgame.pdf

FOX:

"WASHINGTON — The military contractor that built the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and jails throughout Iraq has been tapped to construct facilities in the United States to be used in the event of 'an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S.'

The contract has sparked wide speculation that massive prisons are going to be built to detain illegal immigrants or even U.S citizens, fears that government officials say are unfounded."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198456,00.html

Pooh, pooh, what rot! You can trust the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any media member who mentions this will be added to the list
that explains the deafening silence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Anyone who's sent an email criticizing the crazy monkey'll be added, as well.
I'd bet that anyone criticizing crazy monkey out lout has been added, too.

Remember, post-911, the guy wanted to start a Staasi-like informant system out of ordinary 'Murkans, the TIPS program?

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/14/1026185141232.html

NAZI turds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Octafish
Octafish

I fear that what mr Bush want, and maybe got with this system is far more dangerous than the East Germany with their Stasi ever would have managed to made together.. And in East Germany they KNOW they was bugged all the time.. Not so in the United States of America..

This is far worse than even the old KGB could manage to do, because it is going on in the silence.. No one know if they are been monitored, no one know if their home, their phone, their whole life is been probed and monitored.. In the old Eastern Block, they know they could be bugged, from the cradle to the grave... This is not yet the impression most american have of their own government. They still believe them to be free....

Even the nazis would not have the fantasy to do what this administration are doing on a regular basis.. When Germany attached Poland, for the most part germans was apathetic, it was no mood for the war.. Even the SS, who had spy's over the whole germany could report back to their leader, that in the days after United Kindom and France have given Germany the war for the most part germans was afraid of what come.. And that germans who indeed was in Berlin when the war started, was fearfully. More fearfully than happy over the way the german leadership have been doing things... Intern reports in SS, told that they should have doing a better job, given the "cold welcome" the war in Poland was given.. It was first when Poland was driven of the map, that the support for the german forces was in a surge... And somehow the german leadership managed to continue the support for almost 6 year..

In the US you had more than half the population believe all the lies, this administration was telling you. And over 60 prosent BELIEVED that Saddam Hussein was behind the attack on 11 sept 2001... Who was not right, but a dam lie... This administration have been clever in lying, stealing and pillage the US and the Iraq.. But the truth is coming out, and even the media would not manage to get it silence anymore... The "net" is to independent from the government I guess...


Diclotican

Sorry my bad english, not my native language.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC