Oil in Burma <1992>
Fueling Oppression
by Dara O'Rourke
KNOWN TO HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS as "Asia's new killing fields," Burma is a country violently divided. The military regime which controls the country of 42 million is currently waging battles against more than a dozen ethnic insurgent groups and a student-led democracy movement. The regime, considered illegitimate by most countries in the world, faces international condemnation and pressure from the democratically elected government-in-exile to relinquish power.
The military regime, which calls itself the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), is relying on the exploitation of BurmaÆs natural resources to finance the military battles it is waging against its own people. In 1988, the regime "began to sell BurmaÆs natural resources like fast food," according to the Burma Action Group, a British human rights organization. A main item on this menu is the sale of BurmaÆs oil reserves.
With the critical assistance of multinational oil corporations, the SLORC plans to significantly expand oil production in Burma over the next several years to generate foreign currency to purchase weapons. Between 70 and 90 percent of the profits from oil and gas development will go directly to the military regime. The Burma Rights Movement for Action, an opposition group based in Bangkok, Thailand, estimates oil exploration contracts have accounted for 65 percent of the foreign investment in Burma since 1988.
Michele Bohana, the director of the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Asian Democracy, asserts that "these foreign investments directly support the illegitimate military junta of Burma. The government is bankrupt. They have to get foreign exchange to survive." Further, the SLORC is counting on the large presence of multinational corporations such as Amoco , Unocal , Texaco , Royal Dutch Shell , Petro-Canada and Idemitsu to gain international legitimacy and to fend off proposed international economic sanctions ...
http://www.mediaisland.org/en/chevron-props-myanmar-s-government Unocal Can Be Held Liable For Human Rights Crimes in Burma, Says Appeals Court
Published Date: 19-09-2002
Washington, D.C., Sept 18, 2002
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals today reversed an earlier Federal District Court decision and will allow a groundbreaking human rights lawsuit against Unocal to go forward. In the Doe v. Unocal case, 11 Burmese villagers allege that Unocal, a California based oil company, can be held liable for human rights abuses associated with its Yadana gas pipeline project in Burma. The abuses include rape, forced labor, and murder.
"This is a landmark decision," said Richard L. Herz, an attorney with the non-profit group EarthRights International, co-counsel in the lawsuit. "In recognizing that corporations that aid and abet egregious human rights abuses can be held accountable, the Ninth Circuit has affirmed that US corporations cannot violate international human rights with impunity" ...
http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=1630Global firms provide lifeline to Myanmar's junta
Sep 29, 2007
BANGKOK (AFP) — Despite global outrage over Myanmar's bloody crackdown on dissent, multinational firms are still vying for the country's rich natural resources, throwing an economic lifeline to the military regime.
US energy giant Chevron, French oil group Total and China's top oil producer China National Petroleum Corporation are among companies giving much-needed income to Myanmar, defying activists' calls to pull out.
"All these profits go to the regime. These companies don't care about human rights and what is going on in Yangon," said Debbie Stothard, a coordinator of the Alternative ASEAN Network on Myanmar, a regional pro-democracy body ...
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jono5w9ykIWMyXNPZgt4JiKLKDTgI find your comments about the tsunami credible ... but the problems in Burma go back decades and the behavior of the junta is entirely indefensible