Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration’s Job Projections Miss The Mark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:45 PM
Original message
Administration’s Job Projections Miss The Mark
Latest forecast would need unlikely 460,000 new jobs every month to come true

After a lackluster 2003 in which job creation fell 2.1 million jobs short of the administration’s projections for the year, the President’s Council of Economic Advisers has responded with another overly optimistic projection. Not only did the 1.7 million increase in new jobs that the CEA had projected, on average, for 2003 fail to materialize, we actually lost 400,000 jobs.

The CEA’s new claim that in 2004 the average number of jobs will be 2.6 million higher than in 2003 is out of sync with labor market realities, according to three experts from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Economic Policy Institute. Reaching that level of job creation would require growth averaging 460,000 new jobs every month from now through December 2004.

A new report issued jointly today by the two research groups offers a detailed indictment of the administration’s jobs projections over the past two years and spotlights the administration’s failure to revive the sagging labor market.

The report notes that the CEA’s unduly optimistic projections have forced the administration to continually shift the target as actual job creation falls short of the projections. The report notes that the CEA has downgraded its projections for employment in 2004 from the 138.3 million forecast in 2002 to 135.2 million in its 2003 forecast and now to 132.7 million in this latest forecast. Even so, the rate of job growth required to reach even this scaled back target is far beyond any recent performance in the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh really? And exactly where and how were these jobs supposed to
materialize? Out of the Amazing Kreskins butt? Give me five minutes with these morons and I could probably explain to them that giving jobs to everyone in India and China really isn't going to be much help to anyone here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even the Wall Street Journal disagrees.
The consensus of economists is that unemployment will drop to 5.4% by November. That doesn't begin to address underemployment or those who have given up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC