Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Kit” Seelye flipped about Bush and the Guard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 07:08 PM
Original message
“Kit” Seelye flipped about Bush and the Guard

KIT-FLOP! “Kit” Seelye flipped about Bush and the Guard. Ain’t it time that the press limned this story?

(Jan 28, but still...)

...
How weird! Bush’s superiors had said that he didn’t appear! And yes, they said this in real time! But how convenient! The Bush camp had (belatedly) found a torn document, on which only his middle initial appeared! Apparently, Thomas accepted this absurdly strange document, and—without telling her readers how strange the doc was—she said it proved that the Globe was all wet. But then, the Times pandered to Bush all through Campaign 2000. This late report by credulous Thomas was the paper’s one last, parting gift.
Pitiful, isn’t it? That the press corps left the facts of this story in this absurd state? There are other mysteries about this “torn document” which we’ll note another day. But let’s face it—it wasn’t just Bush who refused to report. Your press corps avoided its duty during Campaign 2000, and we’ve seen the results of their dereliction this past week. We’ve seen Seelye contradict her own paper’s report. We’ve seen Jennings imperiously lecture Clark on “the facts.” In truth, “the facts” of this case are still grossly unclear—as unclear as the origins of that strangely torn document. But who exactly are the “deserters?” In our view, it’s time that the press corps returned to its post and worked its way through this strange story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kit was one of the "spite girls" during the Gore campaign wasn't she?
Are you saying that she is now writing stories about Bush that are not positive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. is therea link Jackpine?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not Jackpine, but here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC