Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Print and Share! The Truth About Neo-Conservatives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kerouac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:39 AM
Original message
Print and Share! The Truth About Neo-Conservatives
The Truth About Neo-Conservatives: Print and Share!!


It's amazing that "liberal" has been turned into such a dirty word while the media and its pundits have no problem with "neo-conservatives," casually referring to them as "Neo-cons" without any compulsion to actually tell the American people what Neo-Conservatives actually believe. It's disgraceful.

Well boys and girls, here's a great lesson on the Neo-Con movement and ideology. I suggest you print it out and read it and share it with others. We must aggressively label the current administration as the dangerous, decidedly un-American Neo-Conservatives they are and back it up with what that means. I have to believe that most people would be aghast at what these criminals believe - and people would be inclined to rethink any positive opinions of Bush & co. that they may still have.

The despicable truth about what neo-conservatives actually believe appear below, using excerpts from Wonderboy's site, followed by a little bit about the right-wing's pro-Nazi/fascist origins. These excerpts come from "Fascist Fantasy," which provides about 20 pages of riveting US history, located at http://www.winterboy.com/dejavu4.html

-------------

"...Members of the new government would preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built up. They regard Christianity as the foundation of our national morality and the family as the basis of our national life." Hitler, in his first radio address to the German people, 2/1/33

"Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right- the right of the superior to rule over the inferior." Leo Strauss, hero of the neo-conservative movement.

1938: German political philosopher Leo Strauss arrives in the US, an ethnic Jew and refugee from Nazi Germany. He struggles with these basic philosophical questions: What is the relation of nature to culture? Can society be founded on rational principles? Has the Enlightenment brought about its own downfall? Strauss teaches at several major universities, including Paul Wolfowitz's alma mater, the University of Chicago, before his death in 1973.

NOTE: Strauss is a popular figure among the late 20th-Century neo-conservatives. Adherents of his ideas include many prominent conservative activists, including: 'Weekly Standard' editor William Kristol and his father (the ‘godfather’ of the neocon movement), Irving Kristol; a number of senior fellows at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI- home to former Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle and Lynne Cheney); members and consultants of the think tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC), including William Kristol; Paul Wolfowitz; Dick Cheney; Richard Perle, Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, etc.

Strauss teaches that deception is the norm in political life. Secrecy is paramount, especially when it comes to matters of foreign policy. Strauss believes that societies should be hierarchical- divided between an elite who should and must lead, and the masses who should follow. Strauss believes that "those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right- the right of the superior to rule over the inferior."

This dichotomy requires "perpetual deception" between the rulers and the ruled, says Strauss, and "The people are told what they need to know and no more." While the elite few are capable of absorbing the absence of any moral truth, Strauss thought, the masses could not cope. If exposed to the absence of absolute truth, they would quickly fall into nihilism or anarchy.

Strauss has a "huge contempt" for secular democracy. Because Strauss views religion as absolutely essential in imposing moral law on the masses (who would otherwise be out of control), 20th century neoconservatives have long argued for religion's greater role in the public sphere, even suggesting that the Founding Fathers of the American Republic made a major mistake by insisting on the separation of church and state.

At the same time, Strauss stresses that religion is for the masses alone; the rulers need not be bound by it. Indeed, it would be absurd if they were, since the truths proclaimed by religion are "a pious fraud." As Ronald Bailey, science correspondent for Reason magazine points out, "Many neoconservatives are pro-religion even though they themselves may not be believers." Secular society in their view is the worst possible thing because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, precisely those traits that may promote dissent which, in turn, could dangerously weaken society's ability to 'cope with external threats.'

Strauss believes that the inherently aggressive nature of human beings can only be restrained by a powerful nationalistic state. "Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed," he writes. "Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united- and they can only be united against other people."

Not surprisingly, Strauss' attitude toward foreign policy is distinctly Machiavellian. Since political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat, he maintains, then if no external threat exists one has to be manufactured.

Perpetual war, not perpetual peace, is what Straussians believe in. The idea easily translates into an "aggressive, belligerent foreign policy," of the kind that has been advocated by neocon groups like PNAC and AEI scholars, not to mention Wolfowitz and other 20th century administration hawks who have called for a world order dominated by US military power. Strauss' neoconservative students see foreign policy as a means to fulfill a "national destiny" (as Irving Kristol defined it as early as 1983).


Perhaps Roosevelt’s two greatest enemies in Congress are Republican Senator Gerald Nye from North Dakota and Democratic Congressmen Martin Dies from Texas. Both head Congressional committees vital to preparation for the coming war. Both abuse their franking privileges (the traditional House practice of sending mail by signature rather than stamp) to mail out propaganda opposing the war, or even propaganda from pro-fascists groups, to thousands of their constituents. Both are openly pro-Nazi/fascist.

On the floor of the Senate, Nye charges that British, not German, submarines have sunk non-Axis ships. He initiates a probe of Hollywood. He arranges for a German-American Bund member to air his views before the Senate, and later uses his Congressional frank to mail thousands of copies of the speech. Later, he's a booster for the American First Committee. Nye also praises and promotes the anti-Semitic preacher Gerald Smith’s sermons.

Hans Thomsen, the charge d'affaires at the German embassy in Washington, mentions Senator Nye in a July 18, 1940, top-secret dispatch to Berlin. Excerpts of Nye speeches from the Congressional Record are being sent by isolationist groups to some 200,000 "specially selected persons."

"This undertaking is not altogether easy and is particularly delicate," Thomsen writes, "since Senator Nye, as a political opponent of the President, is under the careful observation of the secret state police here."

Some Congressmen have no reservations about proclaiming their admiration for Nazi Germany/fascism, and/or their hatred of Roosevelt and his policies. One such Congressman is John Schafer (R-WI). He’s quoted as follows by the press, discussing a ‘revolution against democracy’:

"...the Bloody kind. There will be purges and Roosevelt will be cleaned right off the earth along with the Jews. We’ll have a military dictatorship to save the country."

Senator Rufus Holman (R-Or) inserts pro-Nazi propaganda pieces into the Congressional record. As Oregon’s State Treasurer, he had praised Hitler’s sterilization program and persuaded the Governor to expand Oregon’s ‘sodomy law’ compulsory sterilization program. As well, Holman defends Hitler on the floor of the Senate.

----------

A little bit about the right-wing's pro-Nazi/fascist origins...

As the Depression deepens through the ‘30s, rampant anti-Semitism increases, driven by the Ku Klux Klan and the 750 plus pro-Nazi/fascist grass roots organizations springing up all over America.

William Dudley Pelly, the son of a Methodist minister who believes that Jews are the children of Satan, founds the ‘Silver Shirts’ on January 31, in Asheville, NC (the day Hitler takes power in Germany). He describes the group as a ‘Christian militia.’ Throughout the ‘30s, the Silver Shirts become one of the largest and most violent of the pro-Nazi/fascist groups and are most popular in areas of the country where the Klan is well established.

In the Pacific Northwest they assume dominance among groups after the Klan splits apart in Oregon and Washington. The Silver Shirts are openly pro-Hitler and form alliances with the American Bund and the Klan.

Many of today's far right groups can trace their ancestry directly to the Silver Shirts. The Posse Comitatus’ founder Henry Lamont Beach was a leader of the Silver Shirts in Oregon. Likewise, Richard Butler, the founder of the Aryan Nations in Hayden Lake, ID was also a Silver Shirter (as well as former Klansmen).
Gerald L. K. Smith, one of the founders of today’s Christian Identity religion- common to the Posse, the Aryan nations and many of the militias and Klan groups- is perhaps the most influential former Silver Shirt member. It is the intolerance and blinding racism of religious fundamentalists that binds the fascists groups of the 1930s to today's right-wing extremists groups.

Much of today’s televangelism can be directly traced back to the 1930’s ‘ministries of hate.’ The media may have changed from radio to television, but the delivery is still in the style of Father Coughlin, whose radio broadcasts reach millions. His sermons are filled with virulent hate of Jews, Communism and Roosevelt. Pat Robertson’s, Jerry Falwell’s, or even secular Rush Limbaugh’s ‘sermons’ follow the same formula today - whip up the fear factor, identify the 'other', blame the 'other' as the cause for the original fear. Only now they carefully substitute hatred of gays, welfare (read that as the poor), abortion, unions or any liberal program designed to help the poor or working person, and of course- Bill Clinton, who has replaced Roosevelt as an object of scorn.

------------
These excerpts come from "Fascist Fantasy," which provides about 20 pages of riveting US history, located at http://www.winterboy.com/dejavu4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. How did you...
stumble across that site, kerouac? Googlin'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerouac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Someone posted a link a few days ago.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 12:04 PM by kerouac
Someone posted it a few days ago and said that they found it googlin' and I found it enthralling. I printed out at least 100 pages and have been just savoring every bit of it. Check out the index page for access to over a dozen chronological 'chapters' starting in about 1750.

Here's the index link, which as a great intro:

http://www.winterboy.com/dejavu.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Suh-weet! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's another online source...
definitely related.

The Unauthorized Bio of George Bush (the elder)
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerouac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Skull & Bones, Kerry and Bush, etc
Thanks - great link. I checked out the skull and bones section (http://www.tarpley.net/bush7.htm), which is very disturbing -- especially when you cross-ref some of the names (russel, harriman, brown, bush) with those found at http://www.winterboy.com/dejavu2.html.

I wonder if anyone is concerned about J. Kerry's skull and bones membership...

-----
Excerpt from http://www.tarpley.net/bush7.htm


The order was incorporated in 1856 under the name ``Russell Trust Association.'' By special act of the state legislature in 1943, its trustees are exempted from the normal requirement of filing corporate reports with the Connecticut Secretary of State.

As of 1978, all business of the Russell Trust was handled by its lone trustee, Brown Brothers Harriman partner John B. Madden, Jr. Madden started with Brown Brothers Harriman in 1946, under senior partner Prescott Bush, George Bush's father.

Each year, Skull and Bones members select (``tap'') 15 third-year Yale students to replace them in the senior group the following year. Graduating members are given a sizeable cash bonus to help them get started in life. Older graduate members, the so-called ``Patriarchs,'' give special backing in business, politics, espionage and legal careers to graduate Bonesmen who exhibit talent or usefulness.

The home of Skull and Bones on the Yale campus is a stone building resembling a mausoleum, and known as ``the Tomb.'' Initiations take place on Deer Island in the St. Lawrence River (an island owned by the Russell Trust Association), with regular reunions on Deer Island and at Yale. Initiation rites reportedly include strenuous and traumatic activities of the new member, while immersed naked in mud, and in a coffin. More important is the ``sexual autobiography'': The initiate tells the Order all the sex secrets of his young life. Weakened mental defenses against manipulation, and the blackmail potential of such information, have obvious permanent uses in enforcing loyalty among members.

The loyalty is intense. One of Bush's former teachers, whose own father was a Skull and Bones member, told our interviewer that his father used to stab his little Skull and Bones pin into his skin to keep it in place when he took a bath.

Members continue throughout their lives to unburden themselves on their psycho-sexual thoughts to their Bones Brothers, even if they are no longer sitting in a coffin. This has been the case with President George Bush, for whom these ties are reported to have a deep personal meaning. Beyond the psychological manipulation associated with freemasonic mummery, there are very solid political reasons for Bush's strong identification with this cult.

Observers of Skull and Bones, apologists and critics alike, have accepted various deceptive notions about the order. There are two outstanding, among these falsehoods:

1) that it is essentially an American group, an assembly of wealthy, elite ``patriots''; it is in fact, an agency for British Empire penetration and subversion of the American republic; and

2) that it is somehow the unique center of conspiratorial control over the United States. This misconception is certainly understandable, given the rather astonishing number of powerful, historically important and grotesquely anti-human individuals, who have come out of Skull and Bones. But there are in fact congruent organizations at other Ivy League colleges, which reflect, as does Skull and Bones, the over-arching oligarchical power of several heavily intermarried financier families.

The mistaken, speculative notions may be corrected by examining the history of Skull and Bones, viewed within the reality of the American Eastern Establishment.

Skull and Bones--the Russell Trust Association--was first established among the class graduating from Yale in 1833. Its founder was William Huntington Russell of Middletown, Connecticut. The Russell family was the master of incalculable wealth derived from the largest U.S. criminal organization of the nineteenth century: Russell and Company, the great opium syndicate.

There was at that time a deep suspicion of, and national revulsion against, freemasonry and secret organizations in the United States, fostered in particular by the anti-masonic writings of former U.S. President John Quincy Adams. Adams stressed that those who take oaths to politically powerful international secret societies cannot be depended on for loyalty to a democratic republic.

But the Russells were protected as part of the multiply-intermarried grouping of families then ruling Connecticut (see accompanying chart). The blood-proud members of the Russell, Pierpont, Edwards, Burr, Griswold, Day, Alsop and Hubbard families were prominent in the pro-British party within the state. Many of their sons would be among the members chosen for the Skull and Bones Society over the years.

The background to Skull and Bones is a story of Opium and Empire, and a bitter struggle for political control over the new U.S. republic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC