Krugman: Responding to Recession

[RamboLiberal]

Suddenly, the economic consensus seems to be that the implosion of the housing market will indeed push the U.S. economy into a recession, and that it’s quite possible that we’re already in one. As a result, over the next few weeks we’ll be hearing a lot about plans for economic stimulus.

Since this is an election year, the debate over how to stimulate the economy is inevitably tied up with politics. And here’s a modest suggestion for political reporters. Instead of trying to divine the candidates’ characters by scrutinizing their tone of voice and facial expressions, why not pay attention to what they say about economic policy?

In fact, recent statements by the candidates and their surrogates about the economy are quite revealing.

Take, for example, John McCain’s admission that economics isn’t his thing. “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should,” he says. “I’ve got Greenspan’s book.”

His self-deprecating humor is attractive, as always. But shouldn’t we worry about a candidate who’s so out of touch that he regards Mr. Bubble, the man who refused to regulate subprime lending and assured us that there was at most some “froth” in the housing market, as a source of sage advice?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/opinion/14krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

[spag68]

1. IMHO

Nobody here supporting him anyway.

[tom_paine]

2. As always, Krugman hits the nail on the head. K & R

[antiimperialist]

3. I recommend Krugman's articles without reading them n/t

[Demeter]

4. Reading Greenspan's Book Will Guarantee A Recession That Never Ends

McCain ought to be burning that book, and all copies of it except one for evidence in a fraud trial.

[diane in sf]

5. Good article