Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Village Voice: Sleeping with the GOP (Sharpton covert GOP operative?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:20 PM
Original message
Village Voice: Sleeping with the GOP (Sharpton covert GOP operative?)
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0405/barrett.php


A Bush Covert Operative Takes Over Al Sharpton's Campaign
Sleeping With the GOP

by Wayne Barrett with special reporting by Adam Hutton and Christine Lagorio
February 5th, 2004 8:20 AM


Roger Stone, the longtime Republican dirty-tricks operative who led the mob that shut down the Miami-Dade County recount and helped make George W. Bush president in 2000, is financing, staffing, and orchestrating the presidential campaign of Reverend Al Sharpton.

Though Stone and Sharpton have tried to reduce their alliance to a curiosity, suggesting that all they do is talk occasionally, a Voice investigation has documented an extraordinary array of connections. Stone played a pivotal role in putting together Sharpton's pending application for federal matching funds, getting dollars in critical states from family members and political allies at odds with everything Sharpton represents. He's also helped stack the campaign with a half-dozen incongruous top aides who've worked for him in prior campaigns. He's even boasted about engineering six-figure loans to Sharpton's National Action Network (NAN) and allowing Sharpton to use his credit card to cover thousands in NAN costs—neither of which he could legally do for the campaign. In a wide-ranging Voice interview Sunday, Stone confirmed his matching-fund and staffing roles, but refused to comment on the NAN subsidies.

Sharpton denounced the Voice's inquiries as "phony liberal paternalism," insisting that he'd "talk to anyone I want" and likening his use of Stone to Bill Clinton's reliance on pollster Dick Morris, saying he was "sick of these racist double standards." He did not dispute that Stone had helped generate matching contributions and staff the campaign. Asked about the Stone loans, he conceded that he "asked him to help NAN," but attributed the financial aid to his and Stone's joint "fight against the Rockefeller drug laws," adding: "If he did let me use his credit card to cover NAN expenses, fine." The finances of NAN and the Sharpton campaign have so merged in recent months that they have shared everything from contractors to consultants to travel expenses, though Sharpton insists that these questionable maneuvers have been done in compliance with Federal Election Commission regulations....cont'd




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sharpton Is An Opportunist
He's out for himself and no one else. People who believe Sharpton are fools. The man has a long, long track record of cutting deals for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. For the exception of Kucinich
Which of these politicians don't have a long, long track record of cutting deals for himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because Other Pols Do It, That Excuses Sharpton?
Yes, politicians always cut deals for themselves, but Sharpton claims to be an activist, speaking truth to power, and here he is using Republican help for his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. how does it excuse the other pols?
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 11:21 PM by lcordero
I find the other pols to be slimier than Sharpton.

1. taking away rights
2. aiding and enabling an arch war criminal
3. helping turn the US into a corporatist/fascist state
4. cutting away at the safety net
5. helping push working people into poverty
6. lack of accountability of big business which means that big business is not punished for poisoning our environment


Sharpton is small-time compared to these criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Ahem!
I believed that about Kucinich until when asked why he would throw his support behind a pro-war, anti-gay marriage Edwards, he said he wanted the delegates. Before then, I believed as you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is that a long, long track record of deals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Bingo! Icordero!
I think all the candidates, except DK, have a wee bit of "Me ism" going on. I'm not happy with any of them. However, at this point, I will vote "any dem" for obvious reasons.

Is anyone else getting antsy for this election to be over? I'm starting to get really tired and grouchy. eek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is this a strategy to shift the black vote to Kerry going into S.C.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 11:09 PM by Dover
and the Southern primaries? This article came out just days ago, so at the very least it's interesting timing.

Yes there are serious issues of Sharpton's affiliations, but is there also some truth to Sharpton's assertions that there is a double standard?

Not sure, but this is pretty damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Native Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. According to Barrett, Stone's purpose is to use Sharpton
as a disrupter. As you know, Stone was behind the Miami recount demonstrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think the implications are more serious than just exposing Sharpton
It exposes something about the Dem Party as well. We must assume that this is NOT news to political insiders and yet no one called him on this.

I think the candidates and parties are interchangeable and that the whole thing is a distraction from a bigger truth. These guys ALL work for the same corporate interests and only differ on how to carry out their common agenda. We keep getting evidence of this "crossover" in our candidates and yet refuse to see it for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yup! right you are Dover n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Native Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent interview with Wayne Barrett , investigative reporter
for the Village Voice, can be heard at http://democracynow.org
Great questions from Goodman about the piece referenced above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Storm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He wrote ........

an great biography about the REAL Rudy Giuliani for those interested in learning about the "Mayor of America"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC