Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Selling content: Memphis Editor Admits Fed Ex Sponsorship Idea a Mistake

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 01:56 PM
Original message
Selling content: Memphis Editor Admits Fed Ex Sponsorship Idea a Mistake
Editor&Publisher: Memphis Editor Admits Fed Ex Sponsorship Idea a Mistake
By Joe Strupp
Published: October 18, 2007

NEW YORK Editor Chris Peck of the Memphis Commercial Appeal says the paper ventured into "treacherous ground" when it considered having Federal Express sponsor a six-part series that will likely include reporting on the cargo company. But he stressed that no deal was ever finalized, and the sponsorship fell through after editors opposed it.

"I went to our publisher and said we have probably gone half a step more than we should have gone on this project," Peck told E&P Thursday. "It is treacherous ground when you start talking about having an advertiser in a section that has them in the reporting."

At issue is the pending series "Memphis and the World," set to run over six Sundays starting in November with stories about how the Tennessee city has linked to other parts of the globe. The series came about at the same time the paper has sought new approaches to advertising, including finding sponsors for specific columns and coverage areas. In a September memo to staff, Peck used the phrase "monetizing content" to explain the idea of selling around news and content....

***

As the advertising pursuit continued and reporting for the story occurred, Peck said the top reporter and editor on the project were concerned that Fed Ex could be seen as a conflict since the company would likely appear in the series.

The concerns sparked meetings between advertising and editorial staffers, and even a petition opposing the idea, which sparked a staff meeting on Wednesday. The alt-weekly Memphis Flyer weighed in with a story Wednesday that stated editors had contacted the Poynter Institute for advice and that the controversy was "sending a shockwave through the newsroom." In the end, Peck said the paper decided the series would run as a special section without advertising....

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003660204
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is indeed new(s)...selling news to the highest bidder?
now THAT is scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC