Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vanity Fair: Going After Gore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:39 PM
Original message
Vanity Fair: Going After Gore

Going After Gore

Al Gore couldn't believe his eyes: as the 2000 election heated up, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other top news outlets kept going after him, with misquotes ("I invented the Internet"), distortions (that he lied about being the inspiration for Love Story), and strangely off-the-mark needling, while pundits such as Maureen Dowd appeared to be charmed by his rival, George W. Bush. For the first time, Gore and his family talk about the effect of the press attacks on his campaign—and about his future plans—to the author, who finds that many in the media are re-assessing their 2000 coverage.

by Evgenia Peretz October 2007
Al Gore and Tipper Gore

Vice President Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, arrive in Nashville on June 15, 1999, the day before Gore announced his presidential candidacy. John Russell/AP Images.

As he was running for president, Al Gore said he'd invented the Internet; announced that he had personally discovered Love Canal, the most infamous toxic-waste site in the country; and bragged that he and Tipper had been the sole inspiration for the golden couple in Erich Segal's best-selling novel Love Story (made into a hit movie with Ali MacGraw and Ryan O'Neal). He also invented the dog, joked David Letterman, and gave mankind fire.

Could such an obviously intelligent man have been so megalomaniacal and self-deluded to have actually said such things? Well, that's what the news media told us, anyway. And on top of his supposed pomposity and elitism, he was a calculating dork: unable to get dressed in the morning without the advice of a prominent feminist (Naomi Wolf).

Today, by contrast, Gore is "the Goreacle," the elder statesman of global activism, and something of a media darling. He is the Bono of the environment, the Cassandra of Iraq, the star of an Oscar-winning film, and a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. To the amusement of his kids, some people now actually consider him cool. "If you had told me 10 years ago that people were going to be appealing to me for tickets to a hot rock concert through my parents, I would have fallen over," says his daughter Karenna Gore Schiff, 34, referring to the Live Earth 24-hour extravaganza in July.

What happened to Gore? The story promoted by much of the media today is that we're looking at a "new Gore," who has undergone a radical transformation since 2000—he is now passionate and honest and devoted to issues he actually cares about. If only the old Gore could have been the new Gore, the pundits say, history might have been different.

But is it really possible for a person—even a Goreacle—to transform himself so radically? There's no doubt that some things have changed about Al Gore since 2000. He has demonstrated inner strength, rising from an excruciating defeat that would have crushed many men. Beyond that, what has changed is that he now speaks directly to the public; he has neither the patience nor the need to go through the media.

more, lots more...

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/10/gore200710
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. This sort of stuff infuriates me
especially how they misquoted and distorted his words, again and again. And now they are like 'maybe we should have known better'

YEAH WELL YOU FUCKERS HELPED ELECT THE WORST FUCKING PRESIDENT EVER!

The Love Canal quote especially, how one word change makes Gore look like a liar, when its the fucking press who is incompetent. They changed the quote. Then the kids who were there that day tried to make it right, the reporter tells them to stick it.

It is up to us to make sure they never do this again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read
this last week but I think its should be posted every other day for those that haven't seen it yet.

Whether Gore is your candidate or someone else, we need to recognize the tactics and defend **ALL Dem candidates** from these type of smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They are still doing it
Kerry drinks green tea

JK and the "stuck in Iraq" mis-joke

Obama "looks white" and is "articulate"

Seriously, its so easy, and the press, god damn them are not the best and brightest bulbs on the christmas tree. They are stupid and lazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly
I am hopeful that the majority here gets it eventually. Even if its not for their 'guy', all Dems need to be defended against yellow journalism. All Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lazy, not stupid, and just responding to corporate pressures. It
burns me, too. I thought Moyers gave them a dressing down in his doc. 'Buying the War', but they apparently have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. As an aside: Is that the candle from the Levitra ad? n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 12:20 PM by Seabiscuit
Your "it burns me" comment inspired that thought...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The candles will burn until
our troops are brought home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Kool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Stupid? Lazy?
Pass the crack pipe - they're complicit and criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Um, can you explain two of those
Maybe I'm missing the insinuation here but so what if Kerry drinks green tea? I drink green tea and Obama IS articulate, especially compared to President Malaprop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I did get a laugh from this
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 07:11 PM by fishnfla
Frank Bruni, who did the NYTimes campaign ass-kissing coverage for the 2000 Bush campaign, now does their Friday restaurant reviews. he is mentioned in the VF article posted here

A demotion? more like a promotion, for him, or putting him where he belongs.

Recently he panned a restaurant in his column with very little mention of the food, ambiance, service. Just a bunch of bullshit fluff.

The restaurant owner took out a half page ad in response to the review, and just took him to task for the poor written quality of his review, and wondering why a former political writer was hacking restaurant reviews

it was great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyhuskyfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Recommended Big-Time
You cannot read this article without seething. Or at least I can't. Bush would taking credit for programs (patients bill of rights) that he actually vetoed as governor of Texas (but which got through with a veto-proof vote), and the media didn't give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't generally believe most conspiracies, however I believe
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 03:25 PM by Uncle Joe
this was way too across the board to be otherwise. There was no difference between the made up lies and and slander of the so called right wing sources such as FOX News or the rest of the corporate media. Liberal, progressive, moderate, conservative, libertarian, these definitions meant nothing when it came to reporting the truth regarding Al Gore and Bush prior to the selection of 2000.

This is why, I believe there was something deeper at stake when it came to the "War Against Gore" by the corporate media.

I was viewing Bill Moyers' interviews with the late Professor Joseph Campbell titled "The Power of Myth" telecast on PBS when I had my AHA moment! The treatment of Al Gore by the corporate media was a classic Prometheus scenario, with Al Gore starring as Prometheus, the corporate media owners and CEOs as Zeus and their millionaire pundit puppets and trivia columnists as the vulture.

I kept asking myself what could motivate an entire industry to so obviously slander a superior candidate for the most powerful job in the land while simultaneously camouflaging and enabling an inferior one over him? The obvious answer is shared interest, and the corporate media, all have one thing in common regardless of where they stand on the political spectrum, they make money on information. The largest threat to their monopoly on information is the Internet, the political leader most on the fore front of championing the Internet, thereby empowering the people over the corporate media heads was Al Gore. The upshot is, I believe much of corporate media disdain and treatment of Al Gore was motivated in large part because he championed the Internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why couldn't they taser Maureen Dowd?
She is, in a way, worse than the paid Republican media whores. They do what is expected. Dowd is a flake. As the article says, she preferred Bush over Gore based on her sexual attraction to them. She wanted the fratboy more than the tongue-tied nerd. This woman needs to have the person who transcribes her goofy rantings taken away from her...you don't think she has the brains to write the stuff on paper herself, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Whoreen Dowd's Glossary
Remember, this isn't fiction, this glossary is actually distilled from Whorren's columns!

http://doghouseriley.blogspot.com/2007/09/modo-glossary-2007.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&T -- thanks for posting this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. the media does this every election now. they are doing it again in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. kick because we all need to be reminded of that unbelievable
coverage. The saddest part is how quickly people picked up the catch phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC