Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Democrats’ responsibility in the wake of Gonzales’ resignation by Glenn Greenwald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 07:16 PM
Original message
The Democrats’ responsibility in the wake of Gonzales’ resignation by Glenn Greenwald
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/the-democrats-responsibility-in-the-wake-of-gonzales-resignation-by-glenn-greenwald/

One of the most blatantly dishonest political hacks ever to occupy the position of U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, has now resigned. This is a real moment of truth for the Democratic Congress. Democrats, who have offered up little other than one failure after the next since taking power in January, can take a big step toward redeeming themselves here. No matter what, they must ensure that Gonzales’ replacement is a genuinely trustworthy and independent figure.

That means that Democrats must not confirm anyone, such as Michael Chertoff, who has been ensconced in the Bush circle. Instead, the DOJ and the country desperately need a completely outside figure who will ensure that the prosecutorial machinery operates independently, even if — especially if — that means finally investigating the litany of Executive branch abuses and lawbreaking which have gone almost entirely uninvestigated, as well uncovering those which remain concealed.

The standard excuse invoked by Democrats to justify their capitulations — namely, that they cannot attract a filibuster-proof or veto-proof majority to defy the President — will be unavailing here. They themselves can filibuster the confirmation of any proposed nominee to replace Gonzales. They do not need Blue Dogs or Bush Dogs or any of the other hideous cowards in their caucus who remain loyal to the most unpopular President in modern American history. The allegedly “Good Democrats” can accomplish this vital step all on their own. They only need 40 Senate votes to achieve it.

It is difficult to overstate how vital this is. The unexpected resignation of Gonzales provides a truly critical opportunity to restore real oversight to our government, to provide advocates of the rule of law with a quite potent weapon to compel adherence to the law and, more importantly, to expose and bring accountability for prior lawbreaking. All of the investigations and scandals, currently stalled hopelessly, can be dramatically and rapidly advanced with an independent Attorney General at the helm of the DOJ.

That is not going to happen if the Democrats allow the confirmation of one of the ostensibly less corrupt and “establishment-respected” members of the Bush circle — Michael Chertoff or Fred Fielding or Paul Clement or some Bush appointee along those lines. The new Attorney General must be someone who is not part of that rotted circle at all — even if they are supposedly part of the less rotted branches — since it is that circle which ought to be the subject of multiple DOJ investigations.

As Democrats supposedly just learned (yet again), even the Bush appointees whom they claim (foolishly) to believe they can trust to act independently, such as DNI Mike McConnell, have their ultimate allegiance to George Bush and Dick Cheney. The President is certainly entitled to choose someone who is generally compatible with him ideologically, but the only acceptable replacement for Alberto Gonzales is someone who is truly independent of the Bush machine and whom Democrats are supremely confident will act independently, which means pursuing criminal investigations where warranted of the highest levels of this administration, including the departing Attorney General himself.

Congressional Democrats, insulting the intelligence of their own supporters, have repeatedly claimed to have trusted the Bush administration and its appointees only to be “betrayed” time and again — they were “betrayed” by allowing the confirmation of Alito and Roberts to the Supreme Court based on false assurances that they would respect precedent; they were “betrayed” again by the agreement on the Military Commissions Act between the White House and Graham/Warner/McCain only to then have the agreement modified severely by last-minute changes; they were “betrayed” again by trusting Mike McConnell on the FISA deal; and they even claim to have been “betrayed” by supporting the confirmation of Gonzales himself based upon assurances at his confirmation hearing that he understood and would honor his independent role as Attorney General.

That excuse is not going to work again. Relying on assurances from some current Bush appointee that they will act independently is woefully and self-evidently insufficient. Only a truly outside figure, one who is entirely independent of the Bush circle, should be acceptable.

Pressuring Senate Democrats right away on this is vital. There is no more important domestic political goal then ensuring that the DOJ investigative and prosecutorial machinery operates independently. Senate Democrats will have none of their usual excuses if they fail to compel the nomination of someone truly independent and/or if they sit by meekly and allow the appointment of someone whose independence is even questionable.

Whatever it takes — repeated blocking of nominees, filibustering, protracted hearings — it is critical that it be done in order to restore integrity to the DOJ. A less-than-independent replacement as Attorney General will be entirely the fault of Democrats if they allow it to happen. Conversely, by ensuring the confirmation of someone independent, Senate Democrats can take a major step in revitalizing the rule of law, revitalizing their political base, showing the country they stand for something, and making the case that the 2006 midterm election change of control actually meant something.



Continued…
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/the-democrats-responsibility-in-the-wake-of-gonzales-resignation-by-glenn-greenwald/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love Glenn Greenwald, he's absolutely spot on ... and no way will the Senate Dems heed his advice.
The Dem leadership has already amply demonstrated that they couldn't give a shit less about the "rule of law", and have absolutely no stomach for putting up a fight.

I predict that if the nominee isn't Chertoff, it'll be the indescribably odious Ted Olson, or someone even worse. No matter what, we can look forward to watching in horror as the Dems on the Judiciary committee fall all over themselves to shower the nominee -- whoever it is -- with accolades. I'll bet money on it.

I've seen this movie before -- too damn many times, in fact.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Based on watching the Democrats for the last decade or so, you're probably right.


And that's the big problem that we face. The dem leadership claims that they are the only option we have. They know the repugs are not acceptable to us so they are in the catbird seat for the next elections. We have no other choice.

And that is our challenge. How do we change anything when the only options we have are the bad and the worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Glenn Greenwald the Gasbag au Salon
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 09:54 AM by TheBorealAvenger
Democrats, who have offered up little other than one failure after the next since taking power in January, can take a big step toward redeeming themselves here.
---

Oh, the sun was supposed to cast a beam of righteous light onto Washington and clear out every last doubt about withdrawing from Iraq or voting on some highly-technical-legal bills? And nobody at the Time-Warner network was going to politicize it to the advantage of the gop?

Greenwald did a shit job at the War Room at Salon. I wish that Salon had not given him his own daily column. His writing is much too verbose considering the lack of insight it offers. I am usually tranquilized by the third paragraph...like being hit by a blowfish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC