Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beat a Woman? Play On; Beat a Dog? You're Gone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:11 AM
Original message
Beat a Woman? Play On; Beat a Dog? You're Gone
(WOMENSENEWS)--National Football League superstar Michael Vick is in trouble, serious trouble. Federal prosecutors charged the Atlanta Falcons' quarterback with animal abuse for his role as the alleged leader of a dog-fighting ring and, after denying it for months, Vick pleaded guilty on Monday. He faces stiff sentencing.

He's in big trouble with the NFL too, which has said he might never play professionally again. According to Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFL's Player Association, "the practice of dog-fighting is offensive and completely unacceptable."

I just wish the NFL had the same outrage toward spousal abuse and other forms of domestic violence. But they don't. Not by a long shot.

Scores of NFL players as well as players from the National Basketball Association and Major League Baseball have been convicted of domestic abuse, yet they play on with no fear of losing their careers. Most pay small fines, if that, and are back on the field immediately.

The message is clear. Beat a woman? Play on. Beat a dog? You're gone.

http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm?aid=3285

Also:
Last summer Philadelphia Phillies' pitcher Brett Myers assaulted his wife on a public Boston street and was charged with assault and battery. Major League Baseball did not penalize him, shrugging it off as an off-field incident. Are they saying a player needs to abuse his spouse during a game to get sanctioned? If so, just how does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. trust men to keep their priorities straight --
:eyes:

a good dog is hard to find...

women --- meh --- plenty of them hanging around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. If he did that on a public street
just think what's going on behind closed doors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. I may be wrong about this,
but in some sports and in some circles, doesn't wife beating add to the aura of the player?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is really an apples an oranges argument
Vick didn't just beat on dogs he slaughtered them for entertainment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh fuck - want to talk about wife beating - fine.
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 07:35 AM by TankLV
This story was about a specific CELEBRITY and a specific horrendous act.

We can and do disscuss other important issues - it's not one or the other strawman like you idiots try to claim.

Want to talk about a CURRENT celebrity who abuses his spouse - get the story and we'll discuss it...

Currently Vic the Prick is the news and we're justly outraged...

It's not one or the other...

Get a fucking clue...

I've never read such bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Lovely
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 08:04 AM by MaineDem
Thank you for your comments.

I think the author had legitimate points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. spoken like a 'true' man --
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibInternationalist Donating Member (861 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. She's right, but...
I don't disagree with the author's broader point, but I don't think she should minimize Vick's crimes to make it. He didn't beat dogs, he tortured and killed them. Beating a woman is still equally inexcusable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC