Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Baer, a former CIA officer: Prelude to an Attack on Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:45 PM
Original message
Robert Baer, a former CIA officer: Prelude to an Attack on Iran
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 02:46 PM by RedEarth
Reports that the Bush Administration will put Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on the terrorism list can be read in one of two ways: it's either more bluster or, ominously, a wind-up for a strike on Iran. Officials I talk to in Washington vote for a hit on the IRGC, maybe within the next six months. And they think that as long as we have bombers and missiles in the air, we will hit Iran's nuclear facilities. An awe and shock campaign, lite, if you will. But frankly they're guessing; after Iraq the White House trusts no one, especially the bureaucracy.
..........

Strengthening the Administration's case for a strike on Iran, there's a belief among neo-cons that the IRGC is the one obstacle to democratic and a friendly Iran. They believe that if we were to get rid of the IRGC, the clerics would fall, and our thirty-years war with Iran over. It's another neo-con delusion, but still it informs White House thinking.

And what do we do if just the opposite happens — a strike on Iran unifies Iranians behind the regime? An Administration official told me it's not even a consideration. "IRGC IED's are a casus belli for this administration. There will be an attack on Iran."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1654188,00.html?xid=rss-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. aw fuck
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I echo your sentiment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, even if the neocons are right, and getting rid of the Guards would end the clerics...
That has nothing to do with the fact that getting rid of the Revolutionary Guards is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to do from the air short of a wide-scale strategic nuclear strike (which would, incidentally, also annihilate the masses yearning for democracy). Yeah, you can hurt them, you can annoy them, you can take a stick and beat around their hive, and then the wasps come out and sting you. The idea of the Guards falling in the middle of general conventional air attacks is just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's with all the rose-colored myopia in the neocon lounge area?
...there's a belief among neo-cons that the IRGC is the one obstacle to democratic and a friendly Iran. They believe that if we were to get rid of the IRGC, the clerics would fall, and our thirty-years war with Iran over.


"All we need to do is this one little warlike thing, and peace will break out."

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC