Bush Speechwriter Calls for Attack on Syria

[laststeamtrain]

Bush Speechwriter Calls for Attack on Syria
Gerson's Crusade Against "Low-Hanging Fruit"

By GARY LEUPP

07/25/07 "Counterpunch" -- -- Neocon officials in the Defense Department call them "low-hanging fruit"--- as though countries were produce ripe for picking and eating. The term refers to nations targeted for regime change that might be achieved with minimal strain, at least when compared with the effort needed to topple the regime in Iran. Some neocons are beginning to concede that the effort might not be feasible at this time (not that they would be climbing the tree and plucking the fruit; they'd stand below advising on how it should be done). They're advocating instead that the Bush administration move soon against Syria.

From late 2003 to late 2005 it looked to me as though Syria would be the next "Terror War" target, largely because of Bush's rhetoric, Israeli aggression against Syria and the Israeli propaganda campaign against Syria (suggesting that the missing weapons of mass destruction in Iraq had been transported over the border into the Arab state). But then the Israeli government and Lobby urged the Bush administration to focus its energies on attacking Iran. (Asked by the administration for suggestions for a new leader in Syria to be installed after the toppling of Bashar al-Assad, the Israelis said they couldn't think of one. This position has been repeated as recently as March 2007.) In any case the Israeli government sees Iran as the "existential threat" to itself, Syria more of an irritation.

But the advocated Iran attack has been long-delayed. The neocons have lost some influence, although they remain highly dangerous and influential. Rapid Islamophobes like Elliott Abrams, David Wurmser, Eric Edelman and Eliot Cohen retain their posts, while neocon ideologues such as Bill Kristol enjoy access to cable TV audiences and readers of op-ed pieces in the most widely-read newspapers. The latter very often articulate the view of Vice President Cheney's circle. Cheney is known to be frustrated at the postponement of the planned Iran attack.

In this context, former Bush speechwriter and Christian rightist Michael Gerson published an op-ed in the Washington Post last Friday calling for an attack on Syria to stop its alleged support for the resistance in Iraq. He revives the horticultural metaphor. "Syria. . . . is what one former administration official calls 'lower-hanging fruit,'" Gerson writes, adding "Syria's Baathist regime provides a base of operations for its Iraqi Baathist comrades involved in the Sunni insurgency." He immediately adds, "Suicide bombers from Saudi Arabia and North Africa arrive by plane in Damascus, and, with the help of facilitators, some 50 to 80 cross into Iraq each month. The Syrians say they lack the ability to stop them; what they lack is the intention." He calls for "forceful action against Syria's Ho Chi Minh Trail of terrorists."

<more>

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18069.htm

[John Q. Citizen]

1. Syria and Iran have a mutual defense pact, don't they?

[Name removed]

2. Deleted sub-thread

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[aquart]

3. Baathist? I thought Iraqi Baathists were Sunni?

Forgive me if I get confused. Sunni or Shiite?

The leadership of Syria is not Sunni. It's Alawi and they hate Sunni. Isn't the Syrian Baathist party an alliance of Shiite and other groups, including Alawi, who have banded together against the majority Sunni?

HELP ME! I'M SO CONFUSED BY THIS!

[sarcasmo]

4. We hit Syria and Israel hits Iran? Pakistan is having it's own troubles.

I guess that pretty much takes care of everyone in the middle east but the real culprit, Saudi Arabia, oh wait, Bush is bought and paid for by the Saudi Government, among others.