Open Door Policy

[kalian]

http://www.amconmag.com/1_19_04/article1.html

There were exceptions. When military officers conspicuously crossed the neoconservative party line, the results were predictable—get back in line or get out. One friend, an Army colonel who exemplified the qualities carved in stone at West Point, refused to maneuver into a small neoconservative box, and he was moved into another position, where truth-telling would be viewed as an asset instead of a handicap. Among the civilians, I observed the stereotypical perspective that this too would pass, with policy analysts apparently willing to wait out the neocon phase.
In early winter, an incident occurred that was seared into my memory. A coworker and I were suddenly directed to go down to the Mall entrance to pick up some Israeli generals. Post-9/11 rules required one escort for every three visitors, and there were six or seven of them waiting. The Navy lieutenant commander and I hustled down. Before we could apologize for the delay, the leader of the pack surged ahead, his colleagues in close formation, leaving us to double-time behind the group as they sped to Undersecretary Feith’s office on the fourth floor. Two thoughts crossed our minds: are we following close enough to get credit for escorting them, and do they really know where they are going? We did get credit, and they did know. Once in Feith’s waiting room, the leader continued at speed to Feith’s closed door. An alert secretary saw this coming and had leapt from her desk to block the door. “Mr. Feith has a visitor. It will only be a few more minutes.” The leader craned his neck to look around the secretary’s head as he demanded, “Who is in there with him?”

This minor crisis of curiosity past, I noticed the security sign-in roster. Our habit, up until a few weeks before this incident, was not to sign in senior visitors like ambassadors. But about once a year, the security inspectors send out a warning letter that they were coming to inspect records. As a result, sign-in rosters were laid out, visible and used. I knew this because in the previous two weeks I watched this explanation being awkwardly presented to several North African ambassadors as they signed in for the first time and wondered why and why now. Given all this and seeing the sign-in roster, I asked the secretary, “Do you want these guys to sign in?” She raised her hands, both palms toward me, and waved frantically as she shook her head. “No, no, no, it is not necessary, not at all.” Her body language told me I had committed a faux pas for even asking the question. My fellow escort and I chatted on the way back to our office about how the generals knew where they were going (most foreign visitors to the five-sided asylum don’t) and how the generals didn’t have to sign in. I felt a bit dirtied by the whole thing and couldn’t stop comparing that experience to the grace and gentility of the Moroccan, Tunisian, and Algerian ambassadors with whom I worked.

..much more..

Now, considering the news source of this editorial, it makes me wonder
what type of internal conflict the republicans might be experiencing.
I have a bad feeling about this...

[Dogmudgeon]

1. Pat Buchanan's magazine

While PJ's attitudes toward certain minorities -- like, all of them, especially Jewish people -- are repugnant, a lot of his (and his writers') takes on the Neo-Cons is quite good. (I also don't think Buchanan is a real anti-Semite; he just thinks it enhances his "political incorrectness" to act that way.)

I read American Conservative every so often, since a lot of their opinions are silenced by the Neo-Cons just like those of our own persuasion.

The good thing about AmCon is that, unlike the LaRouchians, you don't have to search out the primary sources to make sure the authors aren't trying to feed you a load of wild-assed cheese. I generally don't agree with AmCon, but it's a pretty good source overall.

--bkl

[Gysgt213]

2. Very good observations. This lady obiviously didn't sit around the office

She took notes. And good for her. I know she is a conservative and that in itself is not ba, but it sounds to me that she can see a lie and have the guts to call what it is. I only wish more conservatives would speak out and not just toe a partie line that's note even theirs.