Of Idiocy and Optimal Climates (by Chris Mooney at HuffPost)

[marmar]

Chris Mooney

Of Idiocy and Optimal Climates
21 Comments | Posted May 31, 2007 | 09:01 AM (EST)

By now it's zinging around more or less everywhere. NASA administrator Michael Griffin made this mind-boggling statement to NPR:

I have no doubt that a trend of global warming exists. I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with.

To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change. I guess I would ask which human beings -- where and when -- are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take.

To be fair to Griffin, there's the germ of an interesting point here. Climate has varied dramatically in past eras of the Earth's history. And these variations in climate have most assuredly favored some parts of the world at the expense of others. Ongoing global warming is, inevitably, going to have the same effect. There are going to be at least some winners, along with all the losers.

So far so good.

But as the blog Prometheus points out, what Griffin is ignoring is the whole issue of risk and its distribution. Our global society is set up for--adapted to--the current climate. But now we're moving in the direction of raising the sea level considerably--even as much of the global population is coastal--and melting large amounts of ice, while also altering the occurrence of phenomena, such as droughts, that could have a dramatic impact on food and water supplies.

How can anyone think this is not a tremendous societal risk, even if there might be some people--in, say, Buffalo, New York--who may actually have more pleasant weather under global warming? ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-mooney/of-idiocy-and-optimal-cli_b_50109.html

[uberllama42]

1. This sort of response is in itself disgustingly arrogant

It ignores the moral imperative on rich, high-emission countries to mitigate the environmental damage they cause. We Americans are by far the worst GHG polluters, but countries in Africa are the ones who will see the most severe negative effects. I don't think I am unfairly usurping the rightful judgment of the African people when I decide that my fellow Americans and I need to make a sacrifice in order to prevent physical and ecnomic suffering in other countries.