loudly gave props to the bush** admin for their decision to attack Iraq?
People quote Friedman now? I feel the same about Friedman as I do those fools who are so sorry they every voted for bush**. And a lot of them did it twice. Their contrition now means nothing to me. And neither does anything Friedman says.
<snip>
Friedman supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, writing that the establishment of a democratic state in the Middle East would force other countries in the region to liberalize and modernize. In his February 9, 2003 column for The New York Times, Friedman also pointed to the lack of compliance with the United Nations Security Council Resolution regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction:
The French position is utterly incoherent. The inspections have not worked yet, says Mr. de Villepin, because Saddam has not fully cooperated, and, therefore, we should triple the number of inspectors. But the inspections have failed not because of a shortage of inspectors. They have failed because of a shortage of compliance on Saddam's part, as the French know. The way you get that compliance out of a thug like Saddam is not by tripling the inspectors, but by tripling the threat that if he does not comply he will be faced with a U.N.-approved war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Friedman