Business and Conservatives Desperate to Stop Employee Free Choice Act

[Omaha Steve]

http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/04/23/business-and-conservatives-desperate-to-stop-employee-free-choice-act/

Business and Conservatives Desperate to Stop Employee Free Choice Act

by James Parks, Apr 23, 2007

Over the weekend, we saw another example of how badly Big Business and its allies in Congress want to stop the Employee Free Choice Act. Today’s Daily Labor Report (subscription required) says Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) railed against the legislation during a speech at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He reportedly said the bill “promises to savagely curtail” workers’ right to a private-ballot election on whether they want union representation.

Hatch urged employer organizations and conservative groups to organize strong opposition to the legislation and to use talk shows, blogs and advertisements to educate the public about its “dangerous” provisions and rebut “fabrications” allegedly made by unions.



The legislation, S. 1041, would rein in the employer harassment, intimidation and stalling that tens of thousands of workers encounter every year when they try to form unions and bargain for a better life. It also would allow workers to decide to join a union by majority sign-up or card-check when an employer agrees to recognize the union if a majority of workers sign union authorization cards.

Business groups and others that oppose the Employee Free Choice Act claim the current National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election system is a good and democratic thing. But by the time employees get to vote, the environment has been so poisoned by employer intimidation and harassment that free and fair choice isn’t an option. (Read why the majority sign-up process is fairer than an NLRB election.)

Just ask Dan Luevano. He and six of his nine co-workers at Ries Electric in Keenesburg, Colo., signed cards saying they wanted to be represented by the Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 68. The owner refused to recognize the union and launched a steady attack against their efforts.

Within days, the company illegally fired Luevano. Although the union filed charges and he won reinstatement to his job, Luevano was shabbily treated by the company and given little work. Meanwhile, the management campaigned against the union, threatened Luevano’s co-workers and held mandatory anti-union meetings. Finally, when the NLRB held an election, the company’s tactics paid off and the workers lost. The vote was a tie, which meant they were denied their union.

FULL story at link.