Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Skeptical of Warhead Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:55 PM
Original message
Congress Skeptical of Warhead Plan
Source: Washington Post

Congressional hearings over the past several weeks have shown that the Bush administration's plan to move ahead with a new generation of nuclear warheads faces strong opposition from House and Senate members concerned that the effort lacks any strategic underpinning and could lead to a new nuclear arms race.

Experts inside and outside the government questioned moving forward with a new warhead as old ones are being refurbished and before developing bipartisan agreement on how many warheads would be needed at the end of what could be a 30-year process. Several, including former senator Sam Nunn (D-Ga.), suggested linking production of a new warhead with U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, a move the Bush administration has opposed.

Rep. David L. Hobson (R-Ohio), who originated what has become the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program, wants the number of warheads in the current U.S. stockpile declassified as "the first step for an honest dialogue on nuclear weapons." Including warheads that are deployed, inactive and in reserve, the total is assumed to be above 6,000.

"I suspect our potential adversaries know the number of U.S. nuclear warheads with much better precision than do the members of Congress," Hobson said at a recent congressional hearing. "I think I know the number," he added, "but I can't talk about it."

Read more: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/21/AR2007042101000.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee Just What We Need More Nukes For Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. As Barbara Boxer said, elections have consequences
and our Democratic Congress is not about to rubber stamp every haired brained idea that Bush has about new weapons or more nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. One more case of Gov contractors & lobbyists selling US something
that doesn't add up, and won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, What Great Idea! Let not refurbish the old, already tested warheads...
...and just buy NEW and Improved Warheads that are a compleatly NEW and Improved design and Compleatly Un-TESTED! Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!

What, you don't trust our untested design? Well, we would test them if we could, but we are banned from doing so, so you'll just have to trust us!

Orrrrrrrr, we could just tell those damn Rooskies to go F*ck themselves and we test them anyway! Yaaaaaaaay! :sarcasm:

Weeeeeeeeeeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC