Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Observer: How the good land turned bad - 4th anniversary of Iraq invasion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:09 AM
Original message
Observer: How the good land turned bad - 4th anniversary of Iraq invasion
The Observer's Foreign Affairs Editor reflects on 4 years of frequent visits to Iraq, and life for ordinary people there

Throughout Iraq's collapse into violence, al-Ansari has continued with his compositions, including one for oboe, two violins, viola and cello called, without irony, The Good Land. It is about Iraq. 'This is still a good land,' he insists. He pauses for a moment of further consideration. 'Maybe the land is good,' he adds, 'but sometimes the people are not good ...'
...
The good land breeds a fatalist humour to confront the horror of daily life. I have heard Iraqis tell jokes about suicide bombers; about George Bush and al-Qaeda's dead leader Musab al-Zarqawi, and firebrand preacher Moqtada al-Sadr. Once, not long after the sexual abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US soldiers was revealed, I came across a group of teenage boys playing roughly in a river, a game that involved trying to pull down the other boys' shorts. 'Abu Ghraib,' they told me they called it, after the prison. Wael, who collects these jokes, explains it is 'the Iraqi way to defy the miseries that they are going through'.
...
We are constantly looking for new metaphors - new ways - to describe Iraq. While we in the West argue about semantics - like whether there is a civil war or not - Iraq's violent disintegration has moved relentlessly to a new phase. The question now is whether Iraq, in large measure and large areas of its territory, has become a 'failed state' . And while there are arguments about what 'failed state' means, there is agreement at least on most of its attributes.

A failed state is one that can no longer provide security and social requirements for its citizens; that has descended into factionalism and warlordism; that cannot guarantee the integrity of its own borders, and lacks the ability to sustain itself. All of which perfectly describes large areas of today's Iraq.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2036446,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC