Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chavez Sidelining the IMF in Latin America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:08 PM
Original message
Chavez Sidelining the IMF in Latin America
http://www.pogge.ca/archives/001498.shtml

Chavez Sidelining the IMF in Latin America


It’s interesting in general how greatly IMF influence has waned over the last few years. I don’t really understand it, although there are a few pointers. The news seems to have generally gotten around after the Asian meltdown and events like the Argentina troubles that IMF funding is a cure worse than the disease—not only for the countries involved, but often for the politicians leading those countries. And I’ve gotten the impression that there’s an awful lot of investment money splashing around these days, so countries haven’t had to go to the “lender of last resort” because there are plenty of other lenders.

But it seems that nowhere has the IMF’s influence disappeared so entirely as in Latin America, in good part because Hugo Chavez has been using oil money to buy bonds and otherwise lend (at much lower interest rates than the IMF from what I’ve heard) to countries in the region, allowing them to pay off IMF debt, substituting lower-interest debt to Venezuela. The effect has been dramatic, according to this article:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is squeezing the International Monetary Fund out of Latin America, the region that once accounted for most of its business. IMF lending in the area has fallen to $50 million, or less than 1 percent of its global portfolio, compared with 80 percent in 2005. Meanwhile, Chavez has used his oil wealth to lend $2.5 billion to Argentina, offer $1.5 billion to Bolivia and hold $500 million out to Ecuador.
It took me a moment to process that—down to 1% of IMF lending from 80%, I got that immediately. But I didn’t at first register that this wipeout happened in one year! It seems as if Chavez, with his ambitious regional economic plans, concluded that the IMF would be a major force blocking those plans, and simply took them out. Say what you want about the man, he has a strong sense of strategy.

A US spokesperson objected,


“Chavez is at grave risk of running out of money,” said Truman, who is now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

The article notes that Chavez is running a deficit. But Venezuela’s debt is around 25-30% of GDP (which is to say, much lower than ours or the US’). And these actions aren’t simply giving away money, either; while generally lower-interest than IMF loans (which are often very high-interest indeed) they are still loans or bond purchases—that is to say, money making investments. In any case, to some extent it doesn’t matter if he can’t keep it up—the IMF doesn’t have any more lending to replace. That job is done; arguably, rather than the IMF having political influence on the region as a lender, it is now Venezuela which inherits that influence (although hopefully it will be wielded in less coercive ways). Mind you, one thing that should be kept in mind is that all this doesn’t mention the World Bank, which I believe actually lends much more money than the IMF, although its reputation is not quite as coercive.

Meanwhile, Venezuela’s economy continues to hum along. Economic growth was at 10% last year even though the oil sector actually declined slightly, and unemployment went down, while employment shifted slightly from the informal towards the formal sector.

Posted by Purple Library Guy at March 2, 2007 01:59 PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. take 47 minutes and understand why its a good thing.....
http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279

Paul Grignon's 47-minute animated presentation of "Money as Debt" tells in very simple and effective graphic terms what money is and how it is being created. It is an entertaining way to get the message out. The Cowichan Citizens Coalition and its "Duncan Initiative" received high praise from those who previewed it. I recommend it as a painless but hard-hitting educational tool and encourage the widest distribution and use by all groups concerned with the present unsustainable monetary system in Canada and the United States. «
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Thanks
I had seen it, was looking for it just now, and couldn't find it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, what an amazing untold back story!
That certainly reveals a lot about why the Bushies hate him. This rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. God bless Hugo. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. IMO, the IMF is a loansharking operation.
They make Bank of America and Citibank look like the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. A must read for those who wonder ...
why the Bush administration, Wall Street, the corporate press, and most prominent democrat politicians, continue the verbal propaganda attack on Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution sweeping through South America. It is fast becoming a regional self financing alternative to the unforgiving capitalist privatizing neoliberal globalization model. An alternative that if it succeeds in evolution to a common market for South and Central America, will offer a political and economic autonomy never before realized in the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. The World Bank/IMF vs. Chavez story is even more profound than this.
Argentina was up to its eyeballs in World Bank/IMF debt. The debt destroyed its economy and nearly destroyed its society. How it works is this. Rightwing governments and rich elites incur the the loans, rip off the money and leave the poor to pay the debt. The terms of repayment are onerous, and include drastic cuts to education and other vital social programs, and opening the country to global corporate predators for resource and labor exploitation. Things got so bad that the Argentinians rebelled. They took to the streets. A coalition of the poor and the middle class went round with tiny hammers and broke every bank ATM display window in the country, in protest. Three governments later--in quick succession--they finally got a good leftist government--that of Nestor Kirchner--which promised to get Argentina out of World Bank/IMF and never get into again. Enter Venezuela--with a highly progressive leftist government, and flush with oil profits. Venezuela, by buying up some of this debt and re-lending on easier terms put Argentina on the road to recovery. And the Chavez government of Venezuela is particularly interested in education and other social programs. It is using its oil profits to completely re-build Venezuelan society--with big adult literacy programs, schools, universities, medical clinics in poor areas never before served by government, small business loans and grants, land reform, infrastructure (such as low cost housing for the poor shantytowns of Caracas which regularly slide off the hills in heavy rains), the new Orinoco Bridge (to Brazil), and other far-thinking development. Unlike the global corporate predators of the World Bank/IMF, Venezuela ENCOURAGES social spending, as the only way for decimated economies and exploited third world countries to recover, and to build societies in which everyone's talents are utilized.

Concurrently, Argentinians, abandoned by the rich and the corporate to miserable poverty, began creating worker coop businesses and strong community self-help projects, in the spirit of revolutionary socialism and democracy that is sweeping South America. Argentina is now well on its way to recovery, with all indicators up. It has therefore become a good trading partner for Brazil, Venezuela and other countries. And it has joined the Bolivarian Revolution--the dream of revolutionary hero Simon Bolivar for regional cooperation and self-determination. (He thought of it as the "United States of South America.") Only by banding together and exerting joint economic and political pressure can the countries of South American muster the strength to fend off exploitation and domination by the economic giant to the north--and often brutal repression by US-imposed dictators.

Bolivia and Ecuador are on a similar path--with socialist Evo Morales elected the first indigenous president of Bolivia. Bolivia underwent a similar rebellion against the Corporate Rulers. Bechtel Corp. had privatized the water in one Bolivian city, then jacked up the prices to the poorest of the poor, even charging poor peasants for collecting rainwater! The Bolivians rebelled, threw Bechtel out of their country, and elected one of the leaders of the rebellion (Morales) as president. In Ecuador, US-educated leftist economist Rafael Correa was overwhelmingly elected. The race was a close one at first (with Ecuador's richest man as the opposition). When Correa was asked about Chavez's UN remark, that Bush is "the devil," and he replied that "it is in insult to the devil," he zoomed ahead and won the election with 60% of the vote (similar to Chavez's mandates in Venezuela). Tells you what Ecuadorans think of Bush.

Venezuela has now helped put together a fund for getting South American countries out of Corporate Ruler debt, and on paths to recovery and social justice. So, it's not just the debt that is the problem, but the consequences to the society of World Bank/IMF repayment terms. It's much like the dilemma of credit card users in the US. Say you have a good worker who gets into trouble with sky rocketing family medical bills. They put medical costs on their credit card. They miss a payment and the interest zooms up sometimes to 30%, huge penalties accrue, and the minimum monthly payment is tripled--naked usury. Then the worker--no matter how hard he or she works--can never get out of debt. No way they can contribute to their kids' college education fund. No way they can save money, buy a house, buy a new car, or take risks looking for better-paying jobs, or have the luxury of re-training or continuing education. They have to work, work, work, just to keep Chase Bank CEO's flush in yachts and expensive cigars. It's a LOSING proposition. But if someone comes along--say a worker coop bank--buys out the Chase debt and cuts the payments in half, for a longer term loan, the worker can now improve his/her situation in ways that enhance everyone's prosperity.

Note: There are, in truth, few scofflaws. Most people want to pay their debts--even when the debts are extremely unfair. They are proud to be able to pay their debts. But the out-of-control credit card companies break their backs. They don't want fair repayment. They want BLOOD.

The credit card jackals that are driving the North American middle class into ruin are the same global corporate predators that drove Argentina into ruin. They have no conscience. They have no loyalty to anyone. They make no contribution to local communities or the future. They evade taxes and regulation. They oppress people. They squeeze every last dime out of people's pockets. They meanwhile use their ungodly profits to lobby against fair taxation of the rich and reasonable regulation in the public interest, and against all commonly created social programs. In the US, they are anxious to loot Social Security. They have already passed the Bankruptcy Law, which has made our people nearly helpless against them. These monstrous entities who have launched themselves from our shores--global financial institutions, Exxon-Mobile, Halliburton, Bechtel--are now eating us alive. And that's what they've been doing to Latin America for the last decade, with the World Bank/IMF as their chief hatchet tool.

And now that they are rebelling--really rebelling, getting themselves organized to repel these jackals--Bush has gone down there to threaten Iraq-type mayhem (civil war, instigated by the Colombian paramilitaries, on which he has larded $4 billion in US taxpayer support (checks written on our future)--fascist thugs who are involved in huge scandals of drug trafficking and mass murder and political assassination)--if they go any further (say to a South American "Common Market" and common currency--which are being talked of). It is no accident that Bush appointed John "death squad" Negroponte as Undersecretary of State for Latin America. It was a threat. Bush the Enforcer is delivering the message in person, on behalf of US-based corporate predators, to the two countries they think they can split off from the South American consensus, Brazil and Uruguay. (The only other countries he is visiting are Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico, all with rightwing governments, who don't have to be told. They are already very repressive, and open for corporate predator business. And it's very interesting the countries that Bush is NOT visiting, and/or CANNOT visit: Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, Peru, Paraguay and Nicaragua--all with leftist governments that are onto Bush, or with big leftist movements that will be elected in the near future (Peru and Paraguay).)

Evo Morales has said: "We want partners, not masters." But that's not what the Bush Junta has in mind. They intend a master/slave relationship in mind, and death and destruction for those who won't knuckle under. I don't think they will succeed, but they can cause of lot of grief as try, once again, to kill democracy in South America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Once again, good informative post, ...
I read a few articles about this previously, and you add more. Thanks again, PP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC